505 LAUREL DR 2025-03-12 - Laserfiche WebLink

r NOVD E'LEOVE 17 2021 V CITY OF EVERETT Permit Services November 151h, 2021 Stephan Collier Anderson Collier Architects 1124 NW 501' St. Seattle, WA 98107 stephanc(irtacarch i tect.com RE: Miles Residence: 505 Laurel Dr. Everett, WA 98201 Permit 4132109-026, Is' Bldg Review Dear Stephan; Swenson Say Faget STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING 2124 Third Ave, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98121 O 206.443.6212 934 Broadway, Suite 100 Tacoma, WA 98402 O 253.284.9470 0 ssfengineers.com We are in receipt of the permit review comments from the City of Everett and have responded to the structural items as follows: l . See Page 7 of the structural calculations. Calculations state that the "J1" joists are supporting the ridge loading. Plans should provide a detail of bracing and connections to the joists. R106.1.1. The support of the ridge loading is unchanged and new sistered joists have been added to stiffen the existing condition. Detail 4/S3.0 has been modified to include this information. 2. See Sheet S2.0. Crawl space joists should be specified on the plans. Calculations specify 2x10 at 16 inches o.c. R106.1.1. The crawl space joist designation of 2x10's has been added to the plans, sheet S2.0. 3. See Sheet S2.0 and S2.1. It appears that the shear wall located at the back of the garage is missing a footing. Plans should provide a footing below the shear wall. R106.1. I. The shear wall in question is not a bearing wall since a new beam has been added to support the roof loads. Lateral loads are transferred to the existing slab with new post installed anchors. A continuous footing is not structurally required. See sheet S2.1 for the addition of notes to attach the bottom of the shear wall to the existing slab. 4. See Sheet A4.0. It appears that the beam supporting the roof may be in the incorrect locations or the roof framing plan does not show existing framing. Roof framing plan on Sheet S2.1 should be updated to show location of the beam or update section to match roof framing plan. If support bracing is being relocated to new beam locations, a detail should be provided showing size and connections to new beams. There are two conditions reflecting new beam construction. Detail 2 shows a "flush" condition, and detail 3 shows a condition with the beam above the existing ceiling joist construction. Both details are cut on the current roof framing plan. 5. See hold down calculations on Page 9. It is not clear if the correct load combination was used when calculating the uplift force. See load combinations in ASCE 7-16 or IBC Section 1605.3.1. It appears that a hold down may be required. Hold downs have been added to the plans for this shear wall location. 6. See Sheet S1.0, Note 11. It appears that a Geotechnical report is referenced in the note, but the report was not submitted. A Geotechnical report should be submitted, and pin piles should be designed according to the report.