My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10111 9TH AVE W EMERALD COURT APARTMENTS 2025-04-18
>
Address Records
>
9TH AVE W
>
10111
>
EMERALD COURT APARTMENTS
>
10111 9TH AVE W EMERALD COURT APARTMENTS 2025-04-18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/18/2025 2:45:44 PM
Creation date
3/20/2025 10:56:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
9TH AVE W
Street Number
10111
Tenant Name
EMERALD COURT APARTMENTS
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> 3. Correction#3: <br /> This comment has not been addressed as stated by the response. The Construction Type on <br /> Sheet A-0.1 should be specified as "VB" in the "Project Data"; a "VA" type is still stated. <br /> Alternatively, fire-rated construction for the roof, beams, and columns is required per IBC Table <br /> 601. See IBC Sections 602.1 and 602.5. <br /> Response#3: <br /> See sheet A-0.1 Project Data section updated. <br /> Fire Protection: <br /> 4. Correction#4: <br /> The design has been revised in response to the original comment to located Carports 2, 3, and 4 at <br /> least 5 feet from the property lines. However, Carport 1 is located less than 20 feet from the <br /> existing "R-2" building with a "V-A" construction. An imaginary property line must be established <br /> between the structures and the respective fire separation distances(FSD)specified. It is noted that <br /> the existing building may not have sufficient construction for the proposed FSD without <br /> modifications. Alternatively, Carport 1 should be redesigned to provide the minimum FSD without <br /> modifications. See IBC Table 602. <br /> Response#4: <br /> Imaginary Property line shown on plan,carport distance from (E.) building on site adjusted. <br /> Structural <br /> General <br /> 1. Correction#1: <br /> This comment has not been addressed. Calculation pages 22 and 23 referenced in the response <br /> do not provide a splitting analysis of the foundation to verify that confinement will be maintained in <br /> the footings to preclude failure of the structure. Footing Detail 01/S2.0 should be provided with top <br /> reinforcement per ACI 318-14 Section 10.7.6.1.6. Alternatively, an analysis per Section 17.2.3.5.3 <br /> should be performed to substantiate that splitting of the foundation does not occur from flexural <br /> restraint of the embedded posts. See IBC Sections 1604.1 and 1604.4. <br /> Response#1: <br /> See Structural response letter&calculations(2 copies) <br /> Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. <br /> Thank you for your assistance. <br /> Best regards, <br /> Derek Arnold <br /> Project Manager <br /> 206-682-5211 <br /> derek@kilburnarchitects.com <br /> Plan Check No.: B2212-057, Third Building Review—Revision Response Letter <br /> ZI '2_ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.