My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9826 7TH AVE SE 2025-06-25
>
Address Records
>
7TH AVE SE
>
9826
>
9826 7TH AVE SE 2025-06-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2025 11:13:52 AM
Creation date
4/1/2025 1:59:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
7TH AVE SE
Street Number
9826
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The comments below were generated from this project's City of Everett Industrial Pretreatment Reviewer. All questions shall be routed through this project's <br />Public Works Reviewer Thad Newport with City of Everett Permit Services (TNewport@everettwa.gov). <br /># <br />Document <br />Sht/Pg <br />Reviewer's Comment <br />Designer's Response <br />Initials <br />hundreds of thousands of dollars. The sole purpose of the larger <br />canopy is to eliminate 883 SF of drainage area. As shown above, <br />the small area outside the canopy has nearly zero impact to the <br />treatment plant's processing of 20,000,000 gallon a day. The <br />Code allows the Director to approve the storm discharge into the <br />sanitary sewer. Hopefully the Director will understand that <br />spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to replace the canopy <br />is not justified by 883 SF of drainage area and will approve the <br />proposed discharge. <br />City's Response: <br />The Public Works Director has been apprised of the permit and <br />the proposed improvements by the applicant to resolve the illicit <br />discharge conditions. While installing a canopy over the existing <br />fueling area may be cost prohibitive there are other solutions <br />that could be proposed like removing the fueling areas outside <br />the covered area which would also reduce the drainage area <br />needing to be routed to sanitary sewer. Without further analysis <br />of design alternatives and documented costs of canopy <br />structures a waiver to discharge stormwater drainage to the <br />sewer systems would not be approved. <br />5 <br />Civil Plans <br />- <br />2nd Review Comment: There is a pipe entering the catch basin <br />The 2-inch canopy roof drain is associated <br />from the north at the Pacific Pride fuel island. The plans <br />with the Pacific Pride fueling island, which <br />submitted do not indicate where this pipe is coming from or <br />has been decommissioned. Closing Pacific <br />what contributes to it. Please indicate what is contributing to <br />Pride addresses all the comments for the <br />this pipe. <br />east fueling island. <br />Designer's Response: As with any existing site, it is difficult to <br />A note to connect the roof drain lines to the <br />establish the exact location and purposes of certain pipes. This is <br />separated storm system was added to the <br />especially true for pipes that are not straight line connected <br />Nelson fueling island. The note requiring <br />between structures that allow observation. Since the pipe has a <br />the roof connection is standard engineering <br />2-inch diameter, it is most likely a roof drain connection to the <br />practice. The site development engineering <br />canopy. This is a private pipe with minimal conveyance capacity <br />permit requires civil design for collection <br />and the canopy area is included in the 1,460 square feet fuel <br />and routing outside the building footprint. <br />island drainage basin. It does not warrant further investigation. <br />The revised plans provide a roof drain <br />Page 6 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.