Laserfiche WebLink
American Property Devel,r.nent ES-0599.05 <br /> January 16, 2015 Page 13 <br /> Updated January 22, 2015 <br /> Drainage <br /> The presence of excessive groundwater seepage is not expected in the general site and utility <br /> excavations. However, zones of perched seepage are possible and may produce moderate <br /> flow rates within the site excavations. Temporary measures to control groundwater seepage <br /> and surface water runoff during construction would likely involve interceptor trenches and <br /> sumps, as necessary. Based on groundwater seepage conditions observed at the test sites, <br /> we do not anticipate extensive dewatering of excavations will be necessary. <br /> At this time we do not anticipate a permanent sub-slab drainage system will be necessary for <br /> this project. However, the location and depth of groundwater seepage and zones of chronic <br /> groundwater are difficult to predict. Therefore, if unanticipated groundwater conditions are <br /> encountered, the geotechnical engineer should reassess the need for additional drainage below <br /> the slab during construction. <br /> Utility Trench Backfill <br /> In our opinion, the soils observed at the test sites are generally suitable for support of utilities. <br /> Excessively loose or unstable soils encountered in the trench excavations should not be used <br /> for supporting utilities. In general, the on-site soils observed at the test sites should be suitable <br /> for use as structural backfill in the utility trench excavations, provided they are at or near the <br /> optimum moisture content at the time of placement and compaction. Moisture conditioning of <br /> the soils may be necessary at some locations prior to use as structural fill. Utility trench backfill <br /> should be placed and compacted to the specifications of structural fill provided in this report, or <br /> to the applicable specifications of the city or county jurisdictions, as appropriate. <br /> LIMITATIONS <br /> The recommendations and conclusions provided in this geotechnical engineering study are <br /> professional opinions consistent with the level of care and skill that is typical of other members <br /> in the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in this area. A warranty is not <br /> expressed or implied. Variations in the soil and groundwater conditions observed at the boring <br /> and test pits locations may exist, and may not become evident until construction. ESNW should <br /> reevaluate the conclusions in this geotechnical engineering study if variations are encountered. <br /> Additional Services <br /> ESNW should have an opportunity to review the final design with respect to the geotechnical <br /> recommendations provided in this report. ESNW should also be retained to provide testing and <br /> consultation services during construction. <br /> Earth Solutions NW, LLC <br />