Laserfiche WebLink
Findings for access from 32nd Street Variance <br /> 17. EMC 13.16.050(F) requires that no permit for a driveway approach be granted if <br /> reasonable egress and ingress can be secured from the alley. Although some of <br /> the access to the parking structure can be secured from the alley, the amount of <br /> needed parking to handle all of the parking needs cannot be handled only <br /> through the alley access. The Applicant seeks an additional vehicular access <br /> from 32nd Street. (exhibit 1, staff report, page 8; exhibit 2, plan set, pages 1, 2 <br /> and 3; testimony of Mr. Ingalsbe) <br /> 18. EMC 13.16.110 includes criteria for the grant of a variance from the standards of <br /> Chapter EMC 13.16. These criteria are the controlling criteria for this variance'. <br /> (exhibit 1, staff report, page 8; testimony of Mr. Ingalsbe) <br /> 19. The twelve-foot elevation difference from the west property line down to the east <br /> property line is significant and is a peculiar physical condition not ordinarily <br /> existing in similar districts in the City. The Applicant's proposal includes three <br /> parking levels under the apartment: the alley entrance would allow access to the <br /> upper parking level, while the 32nd Street access would lead to the middle and <br /> lower parking levels. The design of available parking in the structure provides a <br /> less steep entrance and maneuverability in the parking area. The variance <br /> allows the Applicant the ability to provide sufficient parking, as well as access to <br /> and from the site. (exhibit 1, staff report, page 9; testimony of Mr. Ingalsbe) <br /> 20. With the two access points to parking there will be a reduction of potential <br /> conflicts between vehicles traveling 32nd Street. In addition, traffic flow <br /> impediments within the structure will be reduced. It will also eliminate a need for <br /> vehicular access off Broadway Avenue. The variance is in the public interest and <br /> provides safety conveniences for the general welfare. (exhibit 1, staff report, <br /> page 9; exhibit 2, plan set) <br /> 21. The only adjacent property to the proposed building is on the south side of the <br /> property. The grant of the access off 32nd Street will not adversely affect the <br /> rights of adjacent property owners. (exhibit 1, staff report, page 9; testimony of <br /> Mr. Ingalsbe) <br /> 22. The variance will allow for safer ingress and egress for the residents of the site <br /> and will improve the efficiency and functionality of access to the building. (exhibit <br /> 1, staff report, page 9) <br /> 1 In its narrative,the Applicant submitted a review of the criteria of EMC 19.15.080(B). It states: <br /> "vehicular access; sites abutting an alley shall be required to gain vehicular access from the alley... No <br /> driveway access from the public street shall be allowed unless specifically authorized by the planning <br /> director." The Applicant submitted its review of this request based on the criteria of EMC 19.41.130.C. <br /> EMC 13.16.110 is the controlling criteria for the driveway variance. <br />