My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
400 RIVERSIDE RD SEPA 016 - 039 - RIVERSIDE BUSINESS PARK Land Use Decision Documents 2025-04-14
>
Address Records
>
RIVERSIDE RD
>
400
>
SEPA 016 - 039 - RIVERSIDE BUSINESS PARK
>
Land Use Decision Documents
>
400 RIVERSIDE RD SEPA 016 - 039 - RIVERSIDE BUSINESS PARK Land Use Decision Documents 2025-04-14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2025 7:57:50 AM
Creation date
4/4/2025 9:01:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
RIVERSIDE RD
Street Number
400
Tenant Name
SEPA 016 - 039 - RIVERSIDE BUSINESS PARK
Address Document Type
Land Use Decision Documents
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
166
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
n Check here if there are wetlands or wetland buffers on or adjacent to the project area. <br /> (If there are none, skip to Part 8.) [rear] <br /> 7a. Describe how the project has been designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts to wetlands. [r, ] <br /> ® Not applicable <br /> 7b. Will the project impact wetlands? [help] <br /> ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Don't know <br /> 7c.Will the project impact wetland buffers? [help] <br /> ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Don't know <br /> 7d. Has a wetland delineation report been prepared? [help] <br /> • If Yes,submit the report, including data sheets, with the JARPA package. <br /> ❑ Yes ® No <br /> 7e. Have the wetlands been rated using the Western Washington or Eastern Washington Wetland Rating <br /> System? [help] <br /> • If Yes,submit the wetland rating forms and figures with the JARPA package. <br /> ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Don't know <br /> 7f. Have you prepared a mitigation plan to compensate for any adverse impacts to wetlands? [help] <br /> • If Yes,submit the plan with the JARPA package and answer 7g. <br /> • If No,or Not applicable, explain below why a mitigation plan should not be required. <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Not applicable <br /> 7g. Summarize what the mitigation plan is meant to accomplish, and describe how a watershed approach was <br /> used to design the plan. [i,eip:�] <br /> Not applicable <br /> JARPA Revision 2015.1 Page 8 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.