My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5900 36TH AVE W SEPA 015 - 034 - SOUNDVIEW BUSINESS CAMPUS - VERITAS Land Use Decision Documents 2025-04-22
>
Address Records
>
36TH AVE W
>
5900
>
SEPA 015 - 034 - SOUNDVIEW BUSINESS CAMPUS - VERITAS
>
Land Use Decision Documents
>
5900 36TH AVE W SEPA 015 - 034 - SOUNDVIEW BUSINESS CAMPUS - VERITAS Land Use Decision Documents 2025-04-22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2025 9:53:29 AM
Creation date
4/8/2025 3:24:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
36TH AVE W
Street Number
5900
Tenant Name
SEPA 015 - 034 - SOUNDVIEW BUSINESS CAMPUS - VERITAS
Address Document Type
Land Use Decision Documents
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
984
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Human use of the area is generally oriented toward resource locations (e.g., fresh water, terrestrial <br />and marine food resources, forests, and suitable terrain). Archaeological context for evaluating this <br />project area is provided by information regarding the local and regional chronological sequence and <br />research problem domains as included in Ames and Maschner (1999), Carlson (1990), Meltzer and <br />Dunnell (1987), Wessen and Stilson (1987), and others. <br />Traditional Territories <br />Relevant ethnographic reports and syntheses of archaeological, anthropological, and historical ' <br />sources were also reviewed (e.g., Haeberlin and Gunther 1930; Ruby and Brown 1992; Spier 1936; <br />Suttles and Lane 1990; Waterman 1922, 2001). Information regarding Historic -era cultural features <br />and land -use patterns was acquired by examining nineteenth-century maps. Additional resources for ' <br />ethnohistoric accounts included electronic documents such as historical society and Tribal web <br />pages. <br />The study area is within the traditional lands of the Southern Coast Salish people, who are now , <br />politically associated with the Stillaguamish and Snohomish Tribes (Haeberlin and Gunther 1930; <br />Ruby and Brown 1992; Spier 1936; Waterman 1922, 2001). These are Southern Coast Salish speakers ' <br />of a local dialect of the Lushootseed language (Native Languages 2013; Suttles and Lane 1990; <br />Snohomish 2013). Native Americans in this area recognized distinctions between people based on <br />landscape characteristics while maintaining close social and economic ties. "Saltwater Indians" lived ' <br />at the mouth of the Snohomish River, using both riverine and marine resources. People living inland <br />or upriver were referred to as "Canoe Indians" and made their living from both terrestrial and <br />riverine resources (Suttles and Lane 1990; Waterman 1922, 2001). <br />The Snohomish Tribe "comprised the largest Native American population in this county area... <br />[living] along the shores of Puget Sound from Warm Beach, [south] to Richmond Beach and along <br />the Snohomish River to Monroe" (Riddle 2006). In 1855, the Snohomish, Stillaguamish, and other <br />Puget Sound Tribes met Governor Isaac Stevens and signed treaties which relinquished traditional <br />Tribal lands and forced local Tribes onto reservations. The Snohomish Tribal leaders signed the <br />Point Elliott Treaty, but when it was not ratified, war broke out, and for a time the Snohomish <br />people were placed in internment on Whidbey Island (Snohomish 2013). Following the <br />implementation of the 1855 Treaties by executive order of President Grant in 1873, the Snohomish, <br />Snoqualmie, Skagit, Suiattle, Samish, Stillaguamish, and others were placed on the Tulalip <br />Reservation. Although recognized as a "political entity" as signers of the Point Elliot Treaty, the <br />Snohomish people are not recognized as a "Tribal entity" by the Federal government, and continue <br />to seek Tribal acknowledgement and land restoration (Ruby and Brown 1992:214; Tulalip Tribes <br />2014). Today, the combined Tulalip Tribes exercise traditional fishing rights extending from the <br />Canadian border south to Vashon Island, including the Snohomish River. The Snohomish Tribe <br />also considers the project area vicinity as a usual and accustomed place (Riddle 2008). <br />Recorded Place Names <br />Waterman (1922, 2001) recorded numerous named geographic features near the project area. These <br />include descriptive names for geographic features, resource procurement sites, village (or habitation <br />sites), and names associated with mystical events. Although there are no recorded place names <br />within the project APE or on the parcel's landform, there are two place names recorded within 1.6 <br />km (1.0 mile) to the west of the project APE, one to the north, and one approximately 3.2 km (2.0 <br />miles) to the northeast; all four places are on the shoreline, as would be expected given our current <br />Tierra Archaeological Report No. 2014-077 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.