Ordinance 3311-13 - Laserfiche WebLink

• Exhibit A to Ordinance No. Central Waterfront Redevelopment Plan • building design standards and guidelines 4. What type of uses should the re-use and redevelopment plan allow? Top responses included: • uses that can coexist with public access • uses that provide a large number of family wage jobs • commercial uses, such as retail, restaurant, offices, entertainment See Appendix 3 for a detailed summary of responses to each question. See Appendix 4 for a summary of written comments provided in conjunction with the questionnaire. D. Compatibility with Port of Everett and Naval Station Everett Operations Ordinance#3260-12 directed staff to consider in the reuse planning process the compatibility of future uses with the operations of the Port of Everett maritime terminals and Naval Station Everett. Each abuts the Kimberly-Clark mill site, separated from the mill property by a chain link fence topped with barbed wire. Both facilities are secure facilities that are not open to the general public. In discussions with both organizations, the overriding concern of each is maintaining the safety and security of their facilities as the Kimberly-Clark mill site is redeveloped. Each has expressed concern about public access to the inner harbor and the ability of people to use the harbor for recreational boating or kayaking. Each has also expressed concerns about increased opportunities for terrorist threats that could arise from increased access by the general public. Each has indicated there will be a need for increased vigilance on their part to monitor activities on the former mill site to protect the ongoing security of their facilities and operations. The Port of Everett has indicated they are considering the acquisition of the Kimberly-Clark mill property. If the Port were to purchase the property, it would be to expand the capacity of their maritime terminals. Naval Station Everett has indicated that they are not interested in purchasing the property. Naval Station Everett submitted a formal comment letter dated August 14, 2012, stating concerns about the potential impact of new uses on the site in proximity to the Naval Station (see correspondence in Appendix 7). They requested 80 foot setbacks from their existing buildings and parking areas, which would result in 30—46 foot setbacks from the shared Navy/Kimberly- Clark property line to be consistent with current Department of Defense Anti-Terrorism Force Protection policies. The Navy also requested that any proposed use be required to provide a "comprehensive industrial site security and public safety plan as a condition of site approval," with an opportunity for the Navy to provide input to the plan prior to City approval. The Navy 7