My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance 3311-13
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 3311-13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2016 11:25:35 AM
Creation date
4/14/2016 11:25:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Ordinances
Ordinance Number
3311-13
Date
1/9/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Exhibit A to Ordinance No. <br /> Central Waterfront Redevelopment Plan <br /> also expressed concerns about compatibility of specific uses and forms of public access, <br /> summarized below: <br /> • A facility that manufactures or stores explosive or flammables would be an incompatible <br /> use <br /> • A facility that supports aircraft presence, such as a helipad, would be an incompatible use <br /> • Windows on buildings facing north toward Naval Station Everett should be constructed <br /> using opaque glass to preclude covert activities directed at the Navy <br /> • Public access to the former Kimberly-Clark mill site should not be allowed due to <br /> security concerns. At a subsequent discussion,the Navy indicated that public access <br /> would be acceptable provided recreational users are kept out of the harbor, and that <br /> public access areas maintain a minimum separation from facilities located on base. <br /> • Future businesses that use electromagnetic frequencies in their operations should submit <br /> an "EMR Frequency Spectrum Plan" for review by the Navy, with approval contingent <br /> on compatibility with Navy operations <br /> • Any use that requires additional marine traffic should submit a"Port Operations Plan" for <br /> review by the Navy <br /> • Any plans for proposed piers or wharfs should be submitted for review by the Navy to <br /> ensure no impact to Navy operations <br /> • Recreational boating uses in the harbor would be incompatible with Navy operations <br /> The Navy also requested that standards be developed to address noise, glare, and late night <br /> operations to prevent negative impact to Navy facilities. <br /> E. Building Demolition and Site Cleanup <br /> Kimberly-Clark has started to demolish buildings on the mill site and proposes to clean up any <br /> contaminated soils as quickly as possible in order to prepare the site for re-use and <br /> redevelopment. The company wants to leave a clean site that will allow a future user or users to <br /> continue to provide business and employment opportunities on this waterfront property. The <br /> moratorium on development during the planning process does not apply to demolition permits or <br /> remediation activities. Most buildings will be removed from the site by early 2013. <br /> Kimberly-Clark has worked closely with the Washington Department of Ecology and developed <br /> an Agreed Order for conducting a remedial investigation, feasibility study and preparing a <br /> cleanup action plan for the upland portion of the site. There are also contaminated sediments in <br /> the East Waterway in the harbor abutting the site, including on submerged lands owned by <br /> Kimberly-Clark. The in-water cleanup will take place on a separate track from the uplands, as <br /> there are several responsible parties and in-water cleanup is more complicated. <br /> 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.