Laserfiche WebLink
The comments below were generated from this project's City of Everett Civil Reviewers. All questions shall be routed through the following reviewers: General <br />Civil: Sabrina Good, SGood(cDeverettwa.gov; Signal, pole, & illumination: Euneka Richards, ERichards(@everettwa.gov; SLA: Darcie Byrd, DByrd(cDeverettwa.gov. <br />When coordinating by email, send to all reviewers listed above regardless of subject matter. <br /># <br />Document <br />Sht/Pg <br />Reviewer's Comment <br />Designer's Response <br />Initials <br />14 <br />General <br />— <br />The comments below (#'s 15-21) pertain to plan sheets that were <br />Submittal <br />previously submitted but never fully approved <br />(AT&T/Mastec/LETS plans). While the current Perteet plans <br />reconcile several of the previous Public Works & Traffic <br />Engineering comments, they not yet resolve the below previous <br />comments. Please either address the below issues in the new <br />Perteet plan sheets or resubmit the below called out sheets with <br />the required changes made for approval or further comment. <br />15 <br />Previous <br />A-3 & A-4 <br />Please call out galvanized steel instead of RAL 9006 White <br />Review <br />Aluminum for the type of pole finish. <br />Traffic <br />Engineering <br />Comment <br />16 <br />Previous <br />RF-2 / E-1 <br />Please call out on detail 1 on sheet RF-2 which conduits will <br />Review <br />house the RRH Power, the RRH Fiber, Fiber, and the Coax cable <br />Traffic <br />shown in detail 1 of E-1as they transition from the conduit into the <br />pole. Add additional conduits if necessary, to detail 1 on sheet <br />Engineering <br />RF-2. <br />Comment <br />17 <br />Previous <br />S-1, F-1 <br />Western UT is not a City approved pole manufacturer. Please <br />Review <br />resubmit shop drawings from either Valmont or a City approved <br />Traffic <br />pole manufacturer. <br />Engineering <br />Comment <br />18 <br />Previous <br />A-1, A-2, <br />Upgrade background of civil plans to be consistent throughout all <br />Review <br />A-2.1, & <br />plan sets. Sheets 1-6 of the Verizon/MGC Plans correctly show <br />Public <br />1-6 <br />surveyed utilities and existing features such as sidewalk hatch <br />patterns, landscaping, curb ramps, etc. However, sheets A-1, A- <br />Works <br />2, A-2.1 of the AT&T/Mastec/LETS plans do not show any <br />Comment <br />surveyed utilities, curb ramps, sidewalk or intersection features. <br />(Civil Plans) <br />The City cannot perform a review of new infrastructure to be <br />installed if the existing features are not shown in the <br />background/basemap of the plans as one of the main <br />Page 5 of 6 <br />