4030 COLBY AVE 2025-07-18 - Laserfiche WebLink

The comments below were generated from this project's City of Everett Civil Reviewers. All questions shall be routed through the following reviewers: General Civil: Sabrina Good, SGoodPeverettwa.gov & Thad Newport TNewportPeverettwa.gov; Signal, pole, & illumination: Euneka Richards, ERichards everettwa. ov; SLA: Darcie Byrd, DByrdPeverettwa.gov. When coordinating by email, please send to all reviewers listed above regardless of subject matter. # Document Sht/Pg Reviewer's Comment Designer's Response Initials 8 Previous Previous Comment #19: Previous Response: Review All restoration needs to be called out per City of Everett Standard Perteet added more site specific Public Drawing name and number. On the various plan sets, partial COE information to IL1 for Works Standard Dwg details are included. Other plan sets (like the sidewalk/curb/pavement restoration while Comment illumination plans) include details for restoration but are not continuing to use references to COE (Civil Plans) consistent with the other plan sets. If your details (such as in the Perteet drawings) provide site -specific information beyond what Standard details. COE standard drawings show, they are OK to be used, but Perteet recommends others to remove should be used consistently and should be equivalent or greater than what is required in COE standard drawings. For any COE details 2 and 3 from RF-2, detail 2 from RF- Standard Drawing that is included in the plan sets, please make 3, and detail 2 from RF-4 to be consistent sure they are updated to the current standard drawings. View the with Perteet's plans. current standard drawings at https://eyerettwa.goy/1531/Design- Construction-Standards. Do not include contradicting details New Response: among the different plan sets. New Comment: Thank you for updating the sawcut limits on IL1 and updating the construction notes. Please ensure that there is a note somewhere on the plans that specifically states that all sidewalk restoration shall be full panel restoration (rather than just stating to replace to the nearest joint). We agree with Perteet's recommendation, however this has not been executed in the plan set. Please make these updates prior to resubmittal. The entire design team as a whole needs to coordinate revisions before any portion of the package is resubmitted for re -review. 9 Previous AT&T/ Previous Comment #21: Previous Response: Review Mastec/ Update address on plans to be consistent with permit application. Revised. Public LETS plans Should be 4030 Colby Ave, (not 4020 Colby Ave or 4031 Colby Works sheet T-1 Ave as currently shown throughout the various plan sets). New Response: Comment & Verizon/ New Comment: (Civil Plans) MGC Plans Page 7 of 8