Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />Consent Decree Exhibit C <br />7.0 Future Conditions: Cleanup Action Alternatives <br />and Justification <br />The following sections summarize the alternative cleanup actions for future conditions that were <br />considered in the BFS, and describe the justification under MTCA for selecting the proposed <br />cleanup actions described in Chapter 6.0. <br />Proposed cleanup actions were selected from a list of alternatives and evaluated according to <br />MTCA [WAC 173-340-360(2) and (3)]. Refer to Chapter 5.0 for a detailed description of the <br />criteria. As stated previously, all evaluated alternatives for all pathways meet the threshold <br />criteria of WAC 173-340-360(2). Justification for cleanup action selection for each <br />environmental exposure pathway is organized by the three criteria from WAC 173-340-360(3) <br />and presented in the following sections. <br />7.1 CLEANUP ACTION ALTERNATIVES FOR GAS <br />In addition to the proposed cleanup action for gas, which includes institutional controls, <br />compliance monitoring and phased active landfill gas controls, the following alternatives were <br />evaluated: <br />• Institutional controls, compliance monitoring, contingent active venting for buildings, <br />and passive venting for pavement and open space <br />• Institutional controls, compliance monitoring, contingent active venting for buildings, <br />pavement and open space <br />• Institutional controls, compliance monitoring, and area -wide landfill gas collection <br />system <br />' 7.2 JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSED CLEANUP ACTION FOR GAS <br />7.2.1 Permanent Solutions to the Maximum Extent Practicable <br />All alternatives provide overall protectiveness to human health and the environment. All are <br />effective in reducing the risk of fire and explosion from the accumulation of methane. The <br />proposed cleanup action and the alternative with an area -wide landfill gas collection system <br />provide further protection from the accumulation of toxic pollutants in the interior of buildings by <br />maintaining a continuous vacuum beneath the buildings. <br />The alternatives are effective in the long term. No development would occur on -site without first <br />implementing the technology options from the selected alternative. The technology options of <br />all alternatives except for the area -wide landfill gas collection system alternative would be <br />designed and constructed as an integral part of each component of development. This <br />coordination of design and construction of the technology options for building landfill gas control <br />with the design and construction of the building itself generally provides higher quality and more <br />reliable system performance. The area -wide landfill gas collection system would be more <br />FINAL - March 2001 7-1 Everett Landfill Tire Fire Site <br />Cleanup Action Plan <br />L� <br />