Laserfiche WebLink
Consent Decree Exhibit C <br />7.6 JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSED CLEANUP ACTION FOR DIRECT CONTACT <br />7.6.1 Permanent Solutions to the Maximum Extent Practicable <br />Developed area covers, construction requirements and access controls isolate Site users, the <br />surrounding community, and environmental receptors from direct contact with refuse materials. <br />These measures ensure that construction workers coming in contact with exposed refuse will be <br />appropriately health and safety trained. In this manner, the proposed cleanup action for direct <br />contact meets the cleanup standards and is protective of human health and the environment. <br />This cleanup action provides long-term effectiveness through reliance on institutional controls, <br />compliance monitoring and maintenance of landfill cover. In a landfill setting, reliance on <br />institutional controls for long-term effectiveness is an acceptable and proven alternative. <br />The proposed cleanup action for direct contact includes construction requirements and <br />institutional controls to control short-term risks from construction and maintenance activities. <br />Construction requirements include construction performance monitoring in addition to physical <br />requirements to ensure that performance standards are met. <br />The proposed cleanup action for direct contact does not provide a permanent reduction in the <br />toxicity, mobility or volume of the landfilled refuse. Isolation of landfilled refuse from <br />environmental exposure pathways is a proven and acceptable alternative for municipal landfill <br />facilities. Through developed area cover requirements and institutional controls, the proposed <br />cleanup action for direct contact will increase the certainty of isolation of the refuse from <br />uncontrolled direct contact. <br />The proposed cleanup action for direct contact can be easily implemented during Site <br />development activities. <br />On -site disposal of refuse excavated during development is expected to be minimal. The same <br />cover and grading requirements will apply to relocated refuse, thus isolating relocated refuse <br />from environmental exposure pathways. <br />The costs to implement this alternative will be contained within the development costs for the <br />Site. These costs are not expected to make development of the Site impracticable. <br />Costs for on -site disposal of excavated refuse are estimated to be $35/ton less expensive than <br />for the other alternative that prohibits on -site relocation of excavated refuse. However, it is not <br />possible at this time to estimate whether refuse will be excavated for development or what <br />potential volume of excavated refuse may be included in development plans. <br />Through institutional controls, construction requirements, construction performance monitoring <br />and public access controls, the proposed cleanup action will address most anticipated public <br />concerns regarding direct contact with, or exposure to landfilled materials. Because the <br />proposed cleanup action for direct contact is not expected to cause the traffic and transportation <br />impacts, nor create the potential risk of off -site contamination, that off -site disposal of excavated <br />refuse would cause, the public may have fewer concerns with on -site relocation of excavated <br />refuse. <br />FINAL - March 2001 7-6 Everett Landfill Tire Fire Site <br />Cleanup Action Plan <br />1 <br />