Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> JJMD Buildings Bobs Burger&Brew JN 09266 <br /> INovember 18, 2009 Page 11 <br /> I LOCATION OF FILL PLACEMENT MINIMUM RELATIVE <br /> COMPACTION <br /> Beneath footings, slabs 95% <br /> I , or walkwa s <br /> Filled slopes and behind 90% <br /> retainin• walls <br /> 95%for upper 12 inches of <br /> Beneath pavements subgrade; 90% below that <br /> level <br /> in Where:Minimum Relative Compaction is the ratio,expressed in <br /> I percentages,of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry den- <br /> sity,as determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D <br /> 1557-91 (Modified Proctor). <br /> IThe General section should be reviewed for considerations related to the reuse of on-site soils. <br /> Structural fill that will be placed in wet weather should consist of a coarse, granular soil with a silt or <br /> I clay content of no more than 5 percent. The percentage of particles passing the No. 200 sieve <br /> should be measured from that portion of soil passing the three-quarter-inch sieve. <br /> ILIMITATIONS <br /> The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions as <br /> ' they existed at the time of our exploration and assume that the soil and groundwater conditions <br /> encountered in the test pits are representative of subsurface conditions on the site. If the <br /> subsurface conditions encountered during construction are significantly different from those <br /> I observed in our explorations, we should be advised at once so that we can review these conditions <br /> and reconsider our recommendations where necessary. Unanticipated soil conditions are <br /> commonly encountered on construction sites and cannot be fully anticipated by merely taking soil <br /> samples in test pits. Subsurface conditions can also vary between exploration locations. Such <br /> I unexpected conditions frequently require making additional expenditures to attain a properly <br /> constructed project. It is recommended that the owner consider providing a contingency fund to <br /> accommodate such potential extra costs and risks. This is a standard recommendation for all <br /> projects. <br /> This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of JJMD Buildings, LLC and their <br /> ' representatives, for specific application to this project and site. Our conclusions and <br /> recommendations are professional opinions derived in accordance with current standards of <br /> practice within the scope of our services and within budget and time constraints. No warranty is <br /> I expressed or implied. The scope of our services does not include services related to construction <br /> safety precautions, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, <br /> techniques, sequences, or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for <br /> consideration in design. Our services also do not include assessing or minimizing the potential for <br /> I <br /> biological hazards, such as mold, bacteria, mildew and fungi in either the existing or proposed site <br /> development. <br /> IIIADDITIONAL SERVICES <br /> I Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be retained to provide geotechnical consultation, testing, and <br /> observation services during construction. This is to confirm that subsurface conditions are <br /> IGEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. <br />