Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> JJMD Buildings Bobs Burger&Brew JN 09266 <br /> INovember 18, 2009 Page 3 <br /> IGroundwater <br /> No groundwater seepage was observed in the test pits, which were excavated following the <br /> I onset of fall rains, but before the typically heavy rains of winter and spring. As discussed <br /> above, shallow seepage was observed entering around the storm manhole. This indicates <br /> that shallow groundwater may be encountered perched on top of the glacial till soils and/or <br /> found within utility trenches. This is most likely to occur following extended wet weather. It <br /> I is common to encounter subsurface water perched above and within the relatively <br /> impervious glacial till soils, particularly following extended wet weather. • <br /> CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> IGENERAL <br /> THIS SECTION CONTAINS A SUMMARY OF OUR STUDY AND FINDINGS FOR THE PURPOSES OF A . <br /> ' GENERAL OVERVIEW ONLY. MORE SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS ARE <br /> I CONTAINED IN THE REMAINDER OF THIS REPORT. ANY PARTY RELYING ON THIS REPORT SHOULD <br /> READ THE ENTIRE DOCUMENT. <br /> I The test pits excavated for this study encountered dense to very dense glacial till at a relatively <br /> shallow depth. Based on the absence of the typical weathered layer usually found over glacial till <br /> soils, it is apparent that much of the lot was cut down during past grading for the site development. <br /> I The undisturbed glacial till soils are suitable to support the proposed structure using conventional <br /> foundations. The glacial till can be easily disturbed by foot traffic during the placement of forms <br /> and reinforcing steel. As a result, we recommend that the footing subgrades be protected with 4 to <br /> 6 inches of clean crushed rock after the subgrade soils have been scraped clean of any loose or <br /> Idisturbed soil. <br /> Given the potential for shallow perched water on top of the glacial till, we recommend that the floor <br /> I slab be situated above the existing grade and be underlain by at least 6 inches of clean crush rock <br /> as a capillary break/drainage layer. <br /> I A retaining wall is planned along the north side of the project sothat the-existing sloped landscape <br /> area can be excavated to create more parking. Considering the proximity of this wall to the <br /> northern property line and the paved driveway on the adjoining northern property, it appears that a <br /> reinforced retaining wall will be necessary. Less aggressive retaining structures, such as rockeries, <br /> I <br /> or modular block or ecology block walls are not suitable to support surcharges from vehicle traffic. <br /> Depending on the location of the retaining wall, it may be necessary to temporarily excavate onto <br /> the adjoining property to allow construction of the wall. The wall's footing and drainage system <br /> I would need to be located within the boundaries of the site. Also, provisions should be included for <br /> any surface drainage off that pavement. <br /> I The glacial till soils had a relatively high moisture content at the time of our field explorations. <br /> These fine-grained soils are moisture sensitive and cannot be properly compacted when their <br /> moisture content is too high. Reuse of these soils as structural fill beneath the footings should not <br /> I be attempted. The excavated soils could be reused as structural fill under slab and pavement <br /> areas only if earthwork occurs during dry weather, when the overly-moist soils can be dried prior to <br /> compaction. This would slow the earthwork process, and would not be successful during wet <br /> weather. <br /> IGEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. <br />