My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
501 RIVERSIDE RD REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY EVT TRANSFER FACILITY PHASE 1 SITE IMP Geotech Report 2025-07-28
>
Address Records
>
RIVERSIDE RD
>
501
>
REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY EVT TRANSFER FACILITY PHASE 1 SITE IMP
>
Geotech Report
>
501 RIVERSIDE RD REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY EVT TRANSFER FACILITY PHASE 1 SITE IMP Geotech Report 2025-07-28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2025 11:16:11 AM
Creation date
7/28/2025 11:13:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
RIVERSIDE RD
Street Number
501
Tenant Name
REGIONAL DISPOSAL COMPANY EVT TRANSFER FACILITY PHASE 1 SITE IMP
Address Document Type
Geotech Report
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RDC EVERETTTRANSFER FACILITY su Everett,Washington <br /> 1 <br /> APPENDIX B <br /> LABORATORY TESTING <br /> Soil samples obtained from the explorations were transported to our laboratory and examined to <br /> confirm or modify field classifications, as well as to evaluate-engineering and index properties of <br /> the soil samples. Representative samples were selected for laboratory -testing consisting of <br /> moisture content, grain size distribution determination, percent passing the US No. 200 sieve, <br /> California Bearing Ratio (CBR), and Atterberg limits. The tests were performed in general <br /> accordance with test methods of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) or other <br /> applicable procedures. <br /> Soil Classification <br /> Soil samples obtained from the explorations were visually classified in the field and/or in our <br /> laboratory using a system based on the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) and ASTM <br /> classification methods. ASTM test method D 2488 was used to visually classify the soil samples, <br /> while ASTM D 2487 was used to classify the soils based on laboratory tests results. These <br /> classification procedures are incorporated in the boring logs shown in Figures A-2 through A-9. <br /> Moisture Content Testing <br /> Moisture content tests were completed in general accordance with ASTM D 2216 for <br /> representative samples obtained from the explorations. The results of these tests are presented <br /> on the boring logs shown in Figures A-2 through A-9 at the depths at which the samples were <br /> obtained. <br /> Percent Passing U.S. No.200 Sieve <br /> Selected samples were "washed" through the U.S. No. 200 mesh sieve to determine the relative <br /> percentages of coarse-and fine-grained particles in the soil. The percent passing value represents <br /> the percentage by weight of the sample finer than the U.S. No. 200 sieve. These tests were <br /> conducted to verify field descriptions and to determine the fines content for analysis purposes. <br /> The tests were conducted in general accordance with ASTM D 1140, and the results are shown on <br /> the boring logs at the respective sample depths. <br /> Sieve Analyses <br /> Sieve analyses were performed on two samples within the fill soils in general accordance with <br /> ASTM D 422 to determine the sample grain size distribution. The wet sieve analysis method was <br /> used to determine the percentage ofsoil greater than the U.S. No. 200 mesh sieve. The results of <br /> the sieve analyses were plotted, classified in general accordance with the USCS, and are presented <br /> in Figure B-1. <br /> Atterberg Limits <br /> Atterberg limits testing was performed on selected fine-grained soil samples. The tests were used <br /> to classify the soil and to estimate index properties of the soil. The liquid limit and the plastic limit <br /> were performed in general accordance with ASTM D 4318. The results of the Atterberg limits are <br /> I <br /> GEOENGINEERS� June 18,2013 I Page B-1 <br /> File No.4322-002-00 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.