Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> ' Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, and <br /> Proposed James Monroe Elemental),School Replacement Revised Geoteclznical Engineering Report <br /> Everett, Washington Project and Site Conditions <br /> Disturbed, but representative samples were obtained byusingthe Standard Penetration Test <br /> P P <br /> (SPT) procedure in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials <br /> ' (ASTM):D 1586. This test and sampling method consists of driving a standard 2-inch, <br /> outside-diameter, split-barrel sampler a distance of 18 inches into the soil with a 140-pound <br /> hammer free-falling a distance of 30 inches. The number of blows for each 6-inch interval is <br /> recorded, and the number of blows required to drive the sampler the final 12 inches is known <br /> as the Standard Penetration Resistance ("N") or blow count. If a total of 50 is recorded within <br /> one 6-inch interval, the blow count is recorded as the number of blows for the corresponding <br /> ' number of inches of penetration. The resistance, or N-value, provides a measure of the <br /> relative density of granular soils or the relative consistency of cohesive soils; these values are <br /> plotted on the attached exploration boring logs. <br /> The samples obtained from the split-barrel sampler were classified in the field and <br /> representative portions placed in watertight containers. The samples were then transported to <br /> our laboratory for further visual classification and laboratory testing, as necessary. <br /> ' 4.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS <br /> Subsurface conditions at the project site were inferred from the field explorations accomplished <br /> for this study, visual reconnaissance of the site, and review of selected applicable geologic <br /> literature. Because of the nature of exploratory work below ground, extrapolation of <br /> subsurface conditions between field explorations is necessary. It should be noted that differing <br /> ' subsurface conditions may sometimes be present due to the random nature of deposition and <br /> the alteration of topography by past grading and/or filling. The nature and extent of any <br /> variations between the field explorations may not become fully evident until construction. <br /> ' 4.1 Stratigraphy <br /> Surficial Topsoil <br /> Those exploration borings not located in paved areas generally encountered approximately <br /> ' 6 inches of grass and topsoil. Topsoil is not suitable for structural support, and should be <br /> stripped from structural areas. Excavated topsoil may be suitable for reuse in landscape areas. <br /> ' Existing Paving <br /> Existing paving was encountered at two of the boring locations. The asphalt paving was <br /> ' approximately 2 inches thick at the location of EB-1, and 3 inches thick at the location of <br /> EB-2. Existing paving should be removed from below planned building areas. <br /> ' October.5, 2009 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. <br /> awcad-KE090312A3-Projecas120090312IKEIWP Page 3 <br /> i <br />