Laserfiche WebLink
Proposed View Ridge Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, Infiltration Potential, <br /> Elementary School Replacement and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report <br /> Everett, Washington Preliminary Design Recommendations <br /> restore planned elevations. Reuse of on-site soils for structural fill may require aeration and <br /> drying to reduce moisture contents at the time of construction. Reuse of on-site soils for <br /> structural fill is only allowed if specifically addressed in the project plans and specifications. <br /> Below areas of planned paving, it would be possible to leave existing fill in place with some <br /> remedial preparation. We recommend that paving areas be stripped of existing topsoil, and <br /> proof-rolled and compacted as described later in this report for preparation of paving <br /> subgrades. If the resulting surface is firm and unyielding and compacted to 95 percent or more <br /> of the modified Proctor maximum dry density, no further preparation is required. If the <br /> subgrade is wet or yielding, we recommend that a portion of the existing fill be removed and <br /> replaced with material that is capable of being compacted under field conditions that are <br /> present at the time the work is completed. Decisions on appropriate preparation procedures <br /> should be made in the field at the time of construction when site, soil, and weather conditions <br /> are known. A typical scenario might include replacement of the upper 2 feet of existing fill <br /> with new structural fill. During wet site or weather conditions, select fill may be needed for <br /> this application. It should be noted that leaving existing fill in place below planned paving <br /> carries some risks of future settlement. Such risks are offset by a substantial saving in initial <br /> construction costs. We are available to answer questions regarding cost savings and risks <br /> associated with leaving the existing fill in place below planned paving. <br /> 9.1 Construction Site Drainage and Surface Water Control <br /> The site should be graded to prevent water from ponding in construction areas and/or flowing <br /> into excavations. Exposed grades should be crowned, sloped, and smooth-drum rolled at the <br /> end of each day to facilitate drainage. Accumulated water must be removed from subgrades <br /> and work areas immediately prior to performing further work in the area. Equipment access <br /> may be limited, and the amount of soil rendered unfit for use as structural fill may be greatly <br /> increased if drainage efforts are not accomplished in a timely sequence. If an effective <br /> drainage system is not utilized, project delays and increased costs could be incurred due to the <br /> greater quantities of wet and unsuitable fill, or poor access and unstable conditions. <br /> We anticipate that perched ground water could be encountered in excavations completed during <br /> construction. We do not anticipate the need for extensive dewatering in advance of <br /> excavations. The contractor should be prepared to intercept any ground water seepage entering <br /> the excavations and route it to a suitable discharge location. Depending on grading plans, the <br /> use of cutoff drains might be warranted where grades will slope toward pavement edges or <br /> buildings. If cutoff drains are planned, they should be installed early in the site work phase to <br /> enhance drainage for the remainder of the project. Drainage recommendations are included in <br /> Section 11.1 of this report. <br /> September 22, 2010 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC, <br /> BWG/th-KE10025542-Profect•s1201002551KEtWP Page 13 <br />