My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
202 ALDER ST Geotech Report 2025-07-30 (2)
>
Address Records
>
ALDER ST
>
202
>
Geotech Report
>
202 ALDER ST Geotech Report 2025-07-30 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2025 2:44:57 PM
Creation date
7/30/2025 2:43:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
ALDER ST
Street Number
202
Notes
PRELIMINARY
Address Document Type
Geotech Report
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Proposed View Ridge Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, Infiltration Potential, <br /> Elementary School Replacement and Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report <br /> Everett, Washington Preliminary Design Recommendations <br /> soils and the recommended wall backfill materials, we recommend a seismic surcharge <br /> pressure of 5H and 10H psf, where H is the wall height in feet for the "active" and "at-rest" <br /> loading conditions, respectively. The seismic surcharge should be modeled as a rectangular <br /> distribution with the resultant applied at the midpoint of the walls. <br /> The lateral pressures presented above are based on the conditions of a uniform backfill <br /> consisting of excavated on-site soils, or imported structural fill compacted to 90 percent of <br /> ASTM:D 1557. A higher degree of compaction is not recommended, as this will increase the <br /> pressure acting on the walls. A lower compaction may result in settlement of the slab-on-grade <br /> or other structures supported above the walls. Thus, the compaction level is critical and must <br /> be tested by our firm during placement. Surcharges from adjacent footings or heavy <br /> construction equipment must be added to the above values. Perimeter footing drains should be <br /> provided for all retaining walls, as discussed under the "Drainage Considerations" section of <br /> this report. <br /> It is imperative that proper drainage be provided so that hydrostatic pressures do not develop <br /> against the walls. This would involve installation of a minimum 1-foot-wide blanket drain to <br /> within 1 foot of finish grade for the full wall height using imported, washed gravel against <br /> the walls. The blanket drain should be continuous with and freely communicate with the <br /> footing drain. <br /> 13.1 Passive Resistance and Friction Factors <br /> Lateral loads can be resisted by friction between the foundation and the natural glacial soils or <br /> supporting structural fill soils, and by passive earth pressure acting on the buried portions of <br /> the foundations. The foundations must be backfilled with structural fill and compacted to at <br /> least 95 percent of the maximum dry density to achieve the passive resistance provided below. <br /> We recommend the following allowable design parameters: <br /> • Passive equivalent fluid = 250 pcf <br /> • Coefficient of friction = 0.30 <br /> 14.0 PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Pavement areas should be prepared in accordance with the "Site Preparation" section of this <br /> report. If the stripped native soil or existing fill pavement subgrade can be compacted to <br /> 95 percent of ASTM:D 1557 and is firm and unyielding, no additional overexcavation is <br /> required. Soft or yielding areas should be overexcavated to provide a suitable subgrade and <br /> backfilled with structural fill. <br /> September 22, 2010 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. <br /> BWG/tb-KE100255A2-Projects1201002551KEIWP Page 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.