Laserfiche WebLink
October 16, 2020 <br /> Project No. T-8221 <br /> The preceding discussion is intended to be a brief review of the soil conditions observed at the site. More detailed <br /> descriptions of the subsurface conditions are summarized on the CPT Logs attached in Appendix A. Logs of test <br /> borings and test pits advanced at the site by others are provided in Appendix C. The approximate locations of the <br /> CPTs and test borings/test pits by others are shown on Figure 2. <br /> 3.3 Groundwater <br /> Dissipation tests at CPT-2 through CPT-4 indicate hydrostatic groundwater levels ranging from five to ten feet <br /> below existing grades at those locations. Groundwater levels would be expected to be higher during late winter to <br /> early spring(January through April) and highly influenced by tidal variations. <br /> 1 4.0 SEISMIC <br /> Liquefaction is a phenomenon where there is a reduction or complete loss of soil strength due to an increase in <br /> water pressure induced by vibrations. Liquefaction mainly affects geologically recent deposits of fine-grained sands <br /> ' underlying the groundwater table. Soils of this nature derive their strength from intergranular friction. The <br /> generated water pressure or pore pressure essentially separates the soil grains and eliminates this intergranular <br /> friction;thus, eliminating the soil's strength. <br /> We completed a liquefaction analysis using the computer program LiquefyPro published by CivilTech Corporation. <br /> The analysis was completed using a PGAM of.46 and a magnitude 7 earthquake. This PGAM represents acceleration <br /> ' for the maximum considered event (MCE)which is an earthquake having a 2 percent probability of exceedance in <br /> 50 years. The value was obtained from the Structural Engineers Association of California(SEAOC)U.S. Seismic <br /> Design Maps web site (https://seismicmaps.org/) accessed on September 20, 2019. The results of the liquefaction <br /> analysis are attached in Appendix B. <br /> The results of our analysis indicate soil liquefaction could occur during the design earthquake event. Analysis <br /> indicates that liquefaction could result in total settlements approaching four to seven inches, one-half of which <br /> would likely be differential in nature. In our opinion, this amount of settlement would not structurally impair the <br /> ' building. However,cosmetic damage to the structure in the form of misaligned doors and windows,cracking, and <br /> floor settlement could occur. If the owner is not willing to accept the risk of building damage requiring repair <br /> should liquefaction induced settlements occur, foundations should be supported on ground improved using stone <br /> columns designed to mitigate soil liquefaction settlements below the building foundations or on piles. <br /> The potential for lateral spreading to occur during a design level seismic event was evaluated by performing a <br /> Newmark analysis using the RocScience SLIDE program. Post liquefaction residual strengths were assigned to the <br /> lower sand layer below the groundwater table that are shown to liquefy during the design earthquake. The residual <br /> strengths were assigned using the average correlated standard penetration test "N" values determined at CPT-02 <br /> with Seed and Harder 1990. Ground motion used in the analysis was the seismic record for the 1995 Kobe Japan <br /> earthquake. This record was selected because it had a PGA of.5 which nearly matches the PGAM for the site. A <br /> I <br /> summary printout of the SLIDE Newmark analysis is also included in Appendix B. <br /> ' Page No. 3 <br />