Laserfiche WebLink
In proposing three- four-, and five -unit attached housing, the proposal is an alternative to <br />either single-family detached or large footprint apartment complexes. The project would <br />create additional density on underutilized parcels in a commercially zoned area near a <br />transit. corridor. The proposed density equates to 17 units per acre, which although it is <br />lower than the density that could be achieved, would bring the property into better <br />conformance with the housing goals of the Compressive Plan. Kvhibit 1. <br />28. Planning Staff submitted that by increasing housing supply of by 24 units in an area <br />served by public utilities and service, helping; to meet the City and state housing goals, <br />the project would promote the public use and interest. Because design and construction <br />would be required to comply with current codes for building and fire safety, stormwater <br />management, utilities, and other services, Staff submitted that the project would promote <br />public health, safety, and general welfare. Exhibit 1. <br />SEPA, Notice, andComment <br />29. The City of Everett Planning Department assumed the role of lead agency for review of <br />the environmental impacts of the proposal under the State Environmental Policy Act <br />(SEPA) and determined that compliance with applicable codes would reduce the project's <br />impacts to the point of non -significance. The Department issued a final determination of <br />non -significance (DNS) on April 27, 2022. Exhibits 1 and 36. <br />30. Consistent with EMC 15.02.080.0 and EMC 15.02.110, notice of application, optional <br />SEPA DNS, and public hearing was mailed to owners of property within 500 feet of the <br />site on April 11, 2022. Notice of hearing was also posted in three locations on site on <br />April 12, 2022 and was published in The Daily Herald on April 13, 2022. Exhibits 1, 4, <br />5, and 6. <br />31. In response to notice, the City received comments from 12 members of the public who <br />expressed concerns on the following subjects; that townhome development would not <br />blend or fit into the surrounding neighborhood; that property values would be affected; <br />that the proposed density is too great for the neighborhood; that existing traffic <br />congestion and safety concerns resulting from speed on Mukilteo Boulevard would be <br />made worse by the project, further endangering pedestrian safety; that the project's <br />parking demand would exceed its provisions and parking would spill into the <br />neighborhood; that not enough open space is proposed; that the proposed townhomes <br />would obstruct the current views from upslope residences; concern that the construction <br />phase would open neighbors to security and safety risks; that the townhomes would not <br />be owner occupied; that the development is in the Payne Field flight path; impacts to <br />schools; that drainage from the project would adversely impact downstream property <br />and/or not be adequately managed; and that the proposal would place structures too near <br />existing off -site structures that have narrow/nonconforming setbacks. One comment <br />letter requested the City to require an environmental impact statement. Another topic of <br />wide spread concern was that the project proposes residential rather than neighborhood <br />commercial uses, and that its approval could serve as a precedent for residential <br />Everett Heading Examiner <br />Findings, Conclusions, and Decision <br />Sage Homes Northwest LLC (REV1122-001) <br />page I1 of'22 <br />