Laserfiche WebLink
development of other vacant NB -zoned parcels in the area. Exhibits 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, <br />26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, and 33. <br />32. Prior to hearing, the City also received comments from the Washington State Department <br />of Ecology dated April 25, 2022, which submitted standard comments regarding the <br />toxics clean up standards that could apply in the event that the uses previously onsite may <br />have used an underground oil tank as a heat fuel source and comments indicating that the <br />Category IV wetland delineated on site would be a water of the state subject to the <br />applicable requirements of state law (see RCW 90.48 and WAC 173.201 A) and Section <br />401 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1341) and 40 CFR Section 121.2, including but <br />not limited to the following: a requirement for a jurisdictional determination from the <br />U.S. Army Corps of Engineers stating which delineated wetlands on the property are <br />under federal jurisdiction; a joint aquatics resources permit application (DARPA) form for <br />impacts to jurisdictional wetlands submitted to Ecology, and a required mitigation plan <br />for unavoidable wetland impacts following the standards in Wetland Mitigation in <br />Washington State — Part 1: Agency Policies and Guidance (Ecology Publication # 21-06- <br />003). Ecology's comments were duplicated in a second comment letter dated April 28, <br />2022. Exhibits 21 and 37, <br />33. Several neighbors also provided testimony at the virtual public hearing, expressing the <br />following concerns. <br />During recent nearby construction, one neighbor witnessed construction workers unable <br />to access the porta potty onsite relieving themselves in public. The subject property is <br />also used frequently as a dumping location, and people park there when visiting <br />surrounding properties. <br />One neighbor who works in property management stated that four guest parking stalls <br />will be inadequate for the number of guests the 25 units would draw to the site. One <br />neighbor requested assurance that the residents of the project would not be allowed to <br />park along Mukilteo Boulevard in from of the site; this neighbor also requested that the <br />City do more to enforce parking time limits at Edgewater Park, to ensure residents of <br />this project don't use up those spots. <br />One requested that the project covenants, conditions, and restrictions (OCRs) prohibit <br />any rentals, rather than just short-term rentals. <br />Members of the public requested that native species be used in landscaping, due to their <br />tolerance or local weather and their value to local wildlife. <br />One neighbor testified about groundwater problems in the area, which Ire surmised to <br />be the source of the onsite wetland, and expressed concern for existing stormwater <br />management facilities as a result of the grade changes proposed and the resulting <br />elevation difference between the subject property and surrounding properties. <br />The owner/occupants of 3620 Geyer Lane registered concern about the shared property <br />line because a proposed structure appears to be proposed very close to their accessory <br />structure's exposed foundation wall; their structure has been there since the 1970s and <br />they still need to be able to maintain it. Another neighbor also testified that his garage <br />Everett Hearing Examiner <br />Findings, Conclusions, and Decision <br />Sage Homes Northwest LLC (REV1122-001) <br />page 12 of 22 <br />