My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3702 W MUKILTEO BLVD HARBORS EDGE TOWNHOMES 2025-08-13
>
Address Records
>
W MUKILTEO BLVD
>
3702
>
HARBORS EDGE TOWNHOMES
>
3702 W MUKILTEO BLVD HARBORS EDGE TOWNHOMES 2025-08-13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2025 1:17:43 PM
Creation date
8/13/2025 1:14:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
W MUKILTEO BLVD
Street Number
3702
Tenant Name
HARBORS EDGE TOWNHOMES
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
development of other vacant NB-zoned parcels in the area. Exhibits 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, <br /> 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, and 33. <br /> 32. Prior to hearing,the City also received comments from the Washington State Department <br /> of Ecology dated April 25,2022, which submitted standard comments regarding the <br /> toxics clean up standards that could apply in the event that the uses previously onsite may <br /> have used an underground oil tank as a heat fuel source and comments indicating that the • <br /> Category IV wetland delineated on site would be a water of the state subject to the <br /> applicable requirements of state law(see RCW 90.48 and WAC 173.201 A) and Section <br /> • <br /> 401 of the Clean Water Act(33 USC §1341)and 40 CPR Section 121.2, including but <br /> not limited to the following: a requirement for a jurisdictional determination from the <br /> U.S.Army Corps of Engineers stating which delineated wetlands on the property are <br /> under federal jurisdiction; a joint aquatics resources permit application(JARPA)form for <br /> impacts to jurisdictional wetlands submitted to Ecology,and a required mitigation plan <br /> for unavoidable wetland impacts following the standards in Wetland Mitigation in • <br /> Washington State-Part 1:Agency Policies and Guidance(Ecology Publication#21-06- <br /> 003). Ecology's comments were duplicated in a second comment letter dated April 28, <br /> 2022. Exhibits 21 and 37. <br /> 33. Several neighbors also provided testimony at the virtual public hearing, expressing the <br /> following concerns. <br /> During recent nearby construction, one neighbor witnessed construction workers unable <br /> to access the porta potty onsite relieving themselves in public. The subject property is <br /> also used frequently as a dumping location, and people park there when visiting <br /> surrounding properties. <br /> One neighbor who works in property management stated that four guest parking stalls <br /> will be inadequate for the number of guests the 25 units would draw to the site. One <br /> neighbor requested assurance that the residents of the project would not be allowed to <br /> park along Mukilteo Boulevard in from of the site;this neighbor also requested that the <br /> City do more to enforce parking time limits at Edgewater Park,to ensure residents of <br /> this project don't use up those spots. <br /> One requested that the project covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CCRs)prohibit <br /> any rentals,rather than just short-term rentals. <br /> Members of the public requested that native species be used in landscaping,due to their <br /> tolerance or local weather and their value to local wildlife. <br /> One neighbor testified about groundwater problems in the area, which he surmised to <br /> be the source of the onsite wetland, and expressed concern for existing stormwater <br /> management facilities as a result of the grade changes proposed and the resulting <br /> elevation difference between the subject property and surrounding properties. <br /> The owner/occupants of 3620 Geyer Lane registered concern about the shared property <br /> line because a proposed structure appears to be proposed very close to their accessory <br /> structure's exposed foundation wall; their structure has been there since the 1970s and <br /> they still need to be able to maintain it. Another neighbor also testified that his garage <br /> Everett Hearing Examiner <br /> Findings, Conclusions,and Decision <br /> Sage Homes Northwest LLC(REV1122-001) page 12 of 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.