My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3702 W MUKILTEO BLVD HARBORS EDGE TOWNHOMES 2025-08-13
>
Address Records
>
W MUKILTEO BLVD
>
3702
>
HARBORS EDGE TOWNHOMES
>
3702 W MUKILTEO BLVD HARBORS EDGE TOWNHOMES 2025-08-13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2025 1:17:43 PM
Creation date
8/13/2025 1:14:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
W MUKILTEO BLVD
Street Number
3702
Tenant Name
HARBORS EDGE TOWNHOMES
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In proposing three- four-,and five-unit attached housing,the proposal is an alternative to <br /> either single-family detached or large footprint apartment complexes. The project would <br /> create additional density on underutilized parcels in a commercially zoned area near a <br /> transit.corridor. The proposed density equates to 17 units per acre, which although it is • <br /> lower than the density that could be achieved,would bring the property into better • <br /> conformance with the housing goals of the Compressive Plan. Exhibit 1. <br /> 28. Planning Staff submitted that by increasing housing supply of by 24 units in an area <br /> served by public utilities and service,helping to meet the City and state housing goals, <br /> the project would promote the public use and interest. Because design and construction <br /> would be required to comply with current codes for building and fire safety, stormwater <br /> management, utilities, and other services, Staff submitted that the project would promote <br /> public health,safety, and general welfare. Exhibit 1. <br /> SEPA, Notice, and Comment <br /> 29. The City of Everett Planning Department assumed the role of lead agency for review of <br /> the environmental impacts of the proposal under the State Environmental Policy Act <br /> (SEPA)and determined that compliance with applicable codes would reduce the project's <br /> impacts to the point of non-significance. The Department issued a final determination of <br /> non-significance (DNS) on April 27,2022. Exhibits 1 and 36. <br /> 30. Consistent with EMC 15.02.080.0 and EMC 15.02.110,notice of application, optional <br /> SEPA DNS, and public hearing was mailed to owners of property within 500 feet of the <br /> site on April 11, 2022. Notice of hearing was also posted in three locations on site on <br /> April 12,2022 and was published in The Daily Herald on April 13,2022. Exhibits 1, 4, <br /> 5, and 6. <br /> 31. In response to notice, the City received comments from 12 members of the public who <br /> expressed concerns on the following subjects: that townhome development would not <br /> blend or fit into the surrounding neighborhood;that property values would be affected; <br /> that the proposed density is too great for the neighborhood; that existing traffic <br /> congestion and safety concerns resulting from speed on Mukilteo Boulevard would be <br /> made worse by the project, further endangering pedestrian safety;that the project's <br /> parking demand would exceed its provisions and parking would spill into the <br /> neighborhood;that not enough open space is proposed;that the proposed townhomes <br /> would obstruct the current views from upslope residences; concern that the construction <br /> phase would open neighbors to security and safety risks; that the townhomes would not <br /> be owner occupied;that the development is in the Payne Field flight path; impacts to <br /> schools; that drainage from the project would adversely impact downstream property <br /> and/or not be adequately managed;and that the proposal would place structures too near <br /> existing off-site structures that have narrow/nonconforming setbacks. One comment <br /> letter requested the City to require an environmental impact statement. Another topic of <br /> wide spread concern was that the project proposes residential rather than neighborhood <br /> commercial uses, and that its approval could serve as a precedent for residential <br /> Everett Hearing Examiner <br /> Findings, Conclusions, and Decision <br /> Sage Homes Northwest LLC(REVII22-001) page 11 of 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.