My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3825 COLBY AVE 2025-09-24
>
Address Records
>
COLBY AVE
>
3825
>
3825 COLBY AVE 2025-09-24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2025 10:46:52 AM
Creation date
9/22/2025 2:19:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
COLBY AVE
Street Number
3825
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
September 9, 2021 <br />TO: Drew Martin <br />FROM: Steve Hall, Revive Properties LLC <br />RE: Comments sent regarding application #BW2012-002 <br />Comments in black, response in blue <br />Your application has been received and a permit set up. However, the submitted documents are not sufficient <br />for us to perform a review at this time. The Planning Department has also determined that the project is not <br />sufficient to perform a review; they will issue a comment letter separately. Construction -level documents <br />need to be submitted for review. Information is attached to provide guidance. Preliminary comments are <br />provided below to assist in preparing the drawings, but these are not intended to provide a comprehensive <br />review. Depending on your experience with the model codes and preparing documents, we recommend <br />consulting with a design professional to assist you. <br />There are numerous assumptions in the comments below that do not accurately reflect prior permitted work, <br />county records, and resulting impact on the plan submittal. <br />1. The submitted drawings are not construction -level drawings and generally show the as -built <br />condition. Construction -level drawings should be submitted for review. The drawings should be on the <br />same size sheets of paper and drawn to -scale. The drawings should include both architectural and <br />structural sheets. The existing and new construction should be clearly delineated. <br />The resubmitted drawings are drawn to scale, to general standards, and an as -built and proposed plans <br />are included with the March resubmittal. As shown, the as-builts and proposed plans are the same floor <br />plan with notes with exceptions noted to adding walls and plumbing to the upper floor. There were no <br />changes to the structure of the building or the interior walls on the main floor or in the basement. A <br />permit was obtained C1703-005 (attachment #1) for the post and beam in the basement by a prior owner. <br />The permit is shown in City records as the footing was inspected, approved and archived. The post and <br />beam are available for inspection. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.