My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance 2496-00
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2496-00
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2014 2:38:42 PM
Creation date
4/2/2014 2:38:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Ordinances
Ordinance Number
2496-00
Date
12/13/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11.5. If an applicant disputes the fee described in this section, the applicant has the option of <br /> preparing a traffic analysis at its expense, as described in this ordinance and as approved by the <br /> City Engineer, to demonstrate a lesser impact and to mitigate the transportation impacts in <br /> accordance with section 9 of this chapter. <br /> Section 12: Credit for improvements and non-duplication of mitigation <br /> 12.1. When determining the mitigation costs attributable to the proposed project, the City <br /> Engineer shall take into consideration and give fair credit for transportation improvements, <br /> including dedication of land, that: (1) address some or all of a proposed project's impacts; and/or <br /> (2) have previously been imposed and fulfilled as a condition of a prior land use approval related <br /> to the proposed project. The City Engineer shall also take into consideration and give fair credit <br /> for the contributions made by the subject property owner or his/her predecessor(s) in interest <br /> under any transportation funding device, such as a Local Improvement District (LID), <br /> Transportation Benefit District (TBD), development agreement, or similar mechanism. Any <br /> claim for credit made later than the time of application for a building permit shall be deemed to <br /> be waived. <br /> 12.2. A person required to pay a fee for system improvements under RCW 82.02.050 through <br /> 82.02.090 shall not be required to pay a fee under SEPA and this chapter for those same system <br /> improvements. <br /> 12.3. The prohibition on non-duplication limits the City from requiring an applicant to pay <br /> more than once for a transportation improvement to address the same environmental impact. It is <br /> not a duplicative requirement for an applicant to pay a fee for system improvements and to pay <br /> or install local transportation improvement, provided these different mitigation obligations do not <br /> address the same, specific environmental impact resulting from the project. <br /> 12.4. Agreements may provide for credit for future improvements if the City and applicant <br /> agree that the applicant is implementing transportation improvements beyond those required <br /> under this ordinance. <br /> Section 13: Form of commitment <br /> The applicant may enter into contractual and financing arrangements, including latecomer <br /> agreements, development agreements, or other agreements in any form that is satisfactory to the <br /> City and is legal binding and enforceable on the applicant. Any agreement must bind the <br /> applicant's successors in interest, at least until such time as the improvements have been paid for <br /> or are operational. Any agreements must be in a form approved by the City Attorney. <br /> 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.