My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance 2529-01
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2529-01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2014 1:41:19 PM
Creation date
4/7/2014 1:41:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Ordinances
Ordinance Number
2529-01
Date
8/22/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
IV. STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS <br /> Projected Student Enrollment 2000-2005 <br /> Enrollment projections are most accurate for the initial years of the forecast period. Moving <br /> further into the future, more assumptions about economic conditions and demographic trends in <br /> the area affect the projection. Monitoring birth rates in the County and population growth for the <br /> area are essential yearly activities in the ongoing management of the capital facilities plan. In the <br /> event that enrollment growth slows, plans for new facilities can be delayed. It is much more <br /> difficult, however, to initiate new projects or speed projects up in the event enrollment growth <br /> exceeds the projections. <br /> The GMA requires that planning for public facilities be based on the 20-year population <br /> projections developed by OFM. This element of the GMA has been interpreted to mean the OFM <br /> population forecasts are minimums, which must be accommodated. <br /> The District has developed its own methodology for forecasting future enrollments. The District <br /> produced its enrollment projections using a variation of the cohort survival methodology. Cohort <br /> survival compares enrollment at a particular grade in a particular year, to the subsequent <br /> enrollment at the subsequent grade the following year. For example, the enrollment at first grade <br /> in 1998 is compared to the enrollment at second grade in 1999. The ratio of these two numbers <br /> (second grade enrollment divided by first grade enrollment) creates a "progression ratio", <br /> providing a summary measure of in-and-out migration that has occurred over the course of a year. <br /> Once progression ratios have been established over a period of years, they can be weighted to <br /> predict the likely enrollment in future years3. <br /> The District's forecasts also take into account two other factors — market share loss and <br /> population housing growth. The market share loss factor reflects the number of students within <br /> the District who are enrolled in private schools or within other school districts. The projections <br /> used in this report use a loss factor of five-tenths of a percentage point for 2000-2003, decreasing <br /> to two-tenths of a percentage point for 2004 and beyond4. The population housing growth factor <br /> reflects the number of residential housing permits issued within the District's boundaries. In <br /> 1998, the District captured nearly 18.1% of new housing permits within the County, an increase <br /> from 10.4% in 1997. The forecasts assume that the growth in the new housing market will <br /> continue, and use a 1.021 factor for 2000-2005. <br /> For kindergarten projections, birth data from the County for 1988 through 1998 was used. <br /> Kindergarten enrollments as a percentage of the births from five years earlier were calculated and <br /> averaged. For the past six years, the District has enrolled an average 13% of the county birth <br /> cohort, ranging from 14.2% in 1993 to 12.0% in 1999. For the projections, the birth cohort has <br /> been gradually increased from 12.5% in 2000 to 12.6% for the remainder of the forecast period . <br /> The birth cohort for the 2000 school year is the smallest since 1989, which will result in a smaller <br /> 3 The District projection model uses a five year average of cohort survival rates. <br /> 4 The decrease in market share is due to the assumption that private schools will reach"maturity"and have <br /> reached their maximum enrollment levels. <br /> - 12 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.