Ordinance 2535-01 - Laserfiche WebLink

BE AND THE SAME IS HEREBY SUPERSEDED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE CITY'S LOCAL PROJECT REVIEW PROCEDURES ORDINANCE. SECTION 8: That Section 19 of Ordinance No. 692-80 as amended by Section 6 of Ordinance No. 819-81, Section 7 of Ordinance No. 1121-85, Section 3 of Ordinance No. 1532-88 and Section 6 of Ordinance No. 1969-93 (EMC 2.23.190) which reads as follows: 2.23.190 Reconsideration. Any aggrieved party of record who has actively participated in the hearing before the examiner may file a written request for reconsideration with the examiner within ten working days after the written decision of the examiner has been rendered. "Actively participated in the hearing before the examiner" means oral or written testimony excluding persons who have merely signed a petition. This request shall set forth the specified errors of fact and/or law relied upon. The examiner may deny the request in writing or issue a revised decision or reconvene the public hearing. If an additional hearing is reconvened, notice of said hearing shall be mailed to all parties of record not less than ten working days prior to the hearing date and the examiner's written decision shall be rendered within fifteen working days of the conclusion of the hearing. BE AND THE SAME IS HEREBY SUPERSEDED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE CITY'S LOCAL PROJECT REVIEW PROCEDURES ORDINANCE. SECTION 9: That Section 20 of Ordinance No. 692-80 as amended by Section 7 of Ordinance No. 819-81, Section 2 of Ordinance No. 952-83, Section 2 of Ordinance No. 1121-85, Section 1 of Ordinance No. 1532-88, Section 7 of Ordinance 1969-93 and Section 8 of Ordinance No. 2137-96 (EMC 2.23.200) which reads as follows: 2.23.200 Appeal of city's decision. The decision of the examiner constitutes the final decision of the city except when the examiner makes a recommendation to city council, then the final decision of the city shall be the city council's. Appeals of the city's final decision shall be to Snohomish County Superior Court in accordance with Part VII (appeals) of the Regulatory Reform Act (Chapter 347 of the 1995 Laws of the state of Washington); provided, however, appeals from the city's final decision on shoreline management substantial development permits shall be to the Shoreline Hearings Board pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW. BE AND THE SAME IS HEREBY SUPERSEDED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE CITY'S LOCAL PROJECT REVIEW PROCEDURES ORDINANCE. SECTION 10: That Section 3 of Ordinance No. 1121-85 as amended by Section 9 of Ordinance No. 2137-96 (EMC 2.23.205) which reads as follows: 2.23.205 Recommendation to council. When the city council entertains a recommendation from the examiner, the city council shall accept the findings or conclusions of the examiner, remand the recommendation to 7