Laserfiche WebLink
A. The planning director may, using the review process described in the City's Local <br /> Project Review Procedures Ordinance, authorize a reduced width of planting or waive <br /> some or all of the landscaping requirements in the following instances: <br /> 1. Where,with the exception of the M-1 zone, the requirement of this chapter would <br /> require more than fifteen percent of the site area(excluding parking lots) to be <br /> landscaped, the planning director may modify the requirements so that not more than <br /> fifteen percent of the site area(excluding parking lots) must be landscaped. The planning <br /> director may require more intensive landscaping if the reduction in the required planting <br /> area would reduce the effectiveness of the landscaping to a point where the intent of the <br /> landscape type cannot be satisfied. <br /> 2. When the inclusion of existing vegetation on the site would result in landscaping <br /> equivalent to or better than the requirements of this chapter in achieving the intent of the <br /> required landscape type. <br /> 3. When existing conditions on or adjacent to the site, including,but not limited to, <br /> differences in elevation, existing vegetation, location of buildings or utilities would <br /> render the requirements of this section ineffective. <br /> 4. When Type I visual screening is required, an applicant may request to use <br /> plantings that can be expected to form a healthy sight-obscuring evergreen hedge within <br /> three years in lieu of two rows of trees. In reviewing such a request for modification, the <br /> planning director shall consider the applicant's request in light of the intent of Type I <br /> landscaping and the nature of the use or development which is being screened. <br /> 5. When the applicant proposes an alternative method of landscaping that would <br /> achieve the intent and purpose of the landscaping required in this title and which the <br /> director determines to provide superior quality through the use of native vegetation <br /> existing on site, preservation of groves of trees,preservation of wetlands and/or wildlife <br /> habitat, increasing perimeter landscape width in strategic locations, providing unique <br /> focal points of interest, or through other means. <br /> 6. When development will occur in phases and development of subsequent phases <br /> will result in removal of landscaping required by this title. <br /> 7. When the subject property abuts railroad right-of-way developed with rail <br /> facilities, the planning director may modify the landscaping requirements for that portion <br /> of the property abutting the railroad right-of-way, if such modification will not reduce the <br /> compatibility between the subject property and other properties in the vicinity. <br /> B. In approving a request for a modification of landscaping requirements, the planning <br /> director shall issue finding upon which the approval is based. The director may attach <br /> conditions to any such approval of a request for modification of landscaping requirements <br /> if necessary to assure that the intent of the landscape type and any modification thereof is <br /> maintained. Any appeal of the planning director's decision approving or disapproving a <br /> [See Printed volume for Table 35-1] <br /> request to modify landscaping requirements is subject to the appeals provisions contained <br /> in the City's Local Project Review Procedures Ordinance. <br /> 7. When the subject property abuts railroad right-of-way developed with rail facilities, <br /> the planning director may modify the landscaping requirements for that portion of the <br /> property abutting the railroad right-of-way, if such modification will not reduce the <br /> compatibility between the subject property and other properties in the vicinity. <br /> 32 <br />