Laserfiche WebLink
SECTION 41: That Ordinance No. 1671-89 as amended by Sections 20 & 21 of <br /> Ordinance No. 1729-90 and Sections 30, 33, & 34 of Ordinance No. 1849-92 (EMC <br /> 19.35.080 G)which reads in part as follows: <br /> G. Where off-street parking facilities for multiple-family uses are located adjacent to <br /> single-family zones (R-S, R-S-1, R-1 R-2, R-1(A), R-2(A) and A-1), they shall be <br /> separated therefrom by a fifteen-foot-wide strip landscaped to Type II standards. The <br /> landscape strip may be reduced to ten feet if a six-foot-high solid screening fence <br /> constructed of wood, masonry or combination of wood and masonry are erected on the <br /> property line between the multiple-family use and the single-family zone and Type I <br /> landscaping is provided. Separation between parking areas for multiple-family uses and <br /> adjoining multiple-family zoned properties shall be as provided in Section 15.100 of this <br /> title. <br /> BE AND THE SAME IS HEREBY AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: <br /> G. Where off-street parking facilities for multiple-family uses are located adjacent to <br /> single-family zones (R-S, R-1 R-2, R-1(A), R-2(A) and A-1), they shall be separated <br /> therefrom by a fifteen-foot-wide strip landscaped to Type II standards. The landscape <br /> strip may be reduced to ten feet if a six-foot-high solid screening fence constructed of <br /> wood, masonry or combination of wood and masonry are erected on the property line <br /> between the multiple-family use and the single-family zone and Type I landscaping is <br /> provided. Separation between parking areas for multiple-family uses and adjoining <br /> multiple-family zoned properties shall be as provided in Section 15.100 of this title. <br /> SECTION 42: That Ordinance No. 1671-89 (EMC 19.36.200A(7)) which reads as <br /> follows: <br /> Whenever a lot upon which is located a nonconforming sign is the subject of an <br /> application which requires Review Process III, IV or V, the review authority may require <br /> removal of any nonconforming sign as a condition of approval. <br /> BE AND THE SAME IS HEREBY AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: <br /> Whenever a lot upon which is located a nonconforming sign is the subject of an <br /> application which requires Review Process III, IV or V as set forth in the City's Local <br /> Project Review Procedures Ordinance, the review authority may require removal of any <br /> nonconforming sign as a condition of approval. <br /> SECTION 43: That Ordinance No. 1671-89 as amended by Section 40 of Ordinance <br /> No. 1849-92 (EMC 19.36.210 A) which reads in part as follows: <br /> A. Comprehensive design plan permits. Application may be made to the planning <br /> director for special consideration whereby deviations from the requirements and <br /> restrictions of this section may be permitted when an applicant is using a comprehensive <br /> 33 <br />