My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance 2600-02
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2600-02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2014 2:57:30 PM
Creation date
4/14/2014 2:57:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Ordinances
Ordinance Number
2600-02
Date
4/24/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Findings & Conclusions <br /> 3/1/02 <br /> Page 2 <br /> Board (SHB) entered a decision invalidating WAC 173-26, Ecology's guidelines for <br /> developing local shoreline master programs under the Shoreline Management Act (SMA). <br /> Because of the SHB's decision, review of this amendment is based on the policies and <br /> provisions found in RCW 90.58, including, but not limited to: <br /> • RCW 90.58.020—SMA policies <br /> • RCW 90.58.030—definitions and concepts <br /> • RCW 90.58.090—"optimum implementation" related to shorelines of <br /> statewide significance <br /> • RCW 90.58.100—use of all available information, and elements of a SMP <br /> • RCW 90.58.900 - liberal construction in terms of implementing the SMA <br /> Among the policies set forth in RCW 90.58.020 is the requirement "to provide for the <br /> management of the shorelines of the state by planning for and fostering all reasonable and <br /> appropriate uses" while "...protecting against adverse effects to the public health, the <br /> land and its vegetation and wildlife, and the waters of the state and their aquatic life...". <br /> In terms of shorelines of state-wide significance local government shall, in order of <br /> preference, give preference to: <br /> (1) Recognize and protect the state-wide interest over local interest; <br /> (2) Preserve the natural character of the shoreline; <br /> (3) Result in long term over short term benefit; <br /> (4) Protect the resources and ecology of the shoreline; <br /> (5) Increase public access to publicly owned areas of the shorelines; <br /> (6) Increase recreational opportunities for the public in the shoreline; <br /> (7) Provide for any other element as defined in RCW 90.58.100 deemed appropriate or <br /> necessary. <br /> In preparing master programs, the SMA requires local government to consider"all plans, <br /> studies, surveys, inventories, and systems of classification made or being made by <br /> federal, state, regional, or local agencies, by private individuals, or by organizations <br /> dealing with pertinent shorelines of the state". RCW 90.58.100. <br /> The standard of review of SMPs submitted to the department, as established in RCW <br /> 90.58.090(3) and (4), is that with regard to shorelines, the department must approve a <br /> submittal unless it is inconsistent with the policy of the SMA and with regard to <br /> Shorelines of Statewide Significance, the department must find that the submittal <br /> provides for optimum implementation of the policy of this chapter to satisfy the statewide <br /> interest. <br /> By the SMA's legislative link to the Growth Management Act (GMA), local government <br /> is required to include best available science (BAS) "in developing policies and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.