My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11625 AIRPORT RD BASE FILE 2020-05-29
>
Address Records
>
AIRPORT RD
>
11625
>
BASE FILE
>
11625 AIRPORT RD BASE FILE 2020-05-29
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2020 11:54:54 AM
Creation date
7/26/2016 11:24:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
AIRPORT RD
Street Number
11625
Tenant Name
BASE FILE
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
185
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
pedestrian traffic. (exhibit 1, page 3, staff report; testimony of Ms. Weldon; <br /> testimony of Mr. Chavez; testimony of Mr. Hammer) <br /> 10. The Comprehensive Plan of the City of Everett (Everett General Plan) has <br /> designated the property as 4.4, Mixed Use Commercial- Multi-Family. The <br /> variance would be consistent with the Everett General Plan. (exhibit 1, page 3, <br /> staff report) <br /> 11. The E-1 MUO regulations were adopted in 2012, a significant period of time after <br /> the buildings of the fronting property and the subject property were developed. <br /> Because the Applicant does not have control over the location of the front <br /> property's sign location, and cannot move that sign to satisfy the separation <br /> requirement, the City determined that the requested variance is not a self-created <br /> hardship. (exhibit 1, page 3, staff report; testimony of Ms. Weldon) <br /> CONCLUSIONS OF LAW <br /> Jurisdiction <br /> Jurisdiction: The Hearing Examiner of the City of Everett has jurisdictional authority to <br /> hold a hearing and to issue the decision. That authority is set forth in EMC <br /> 15.16.11O.A.17. Based on the above Findings of Fact, the Hearing Examiner enters the <br /> following Conclusions: <br /> Criteria and Standards for Review <br /> EMC 19.41.130.0 <br /> (1) The variance will not be materially detrimental to the property in the <br /> area of the subject property or the City as a whole. <br /> (2) The variance is necessary because of exceptional or extraordinary <br /> circumstances regarding the size, shape, topography or location of <br /> IF the subject property; or the location of a preexisting improvement on <br /> the subject property that conformed to the zoning code in effect <br /> when the improvement was constructed. <br /> (3) The variance will only grant the subject property the same general <br /> rights enjoyed by other property in the same area and zone as the <br /> subject property. <br /> (4) The variance is the minimum necessary to allow the subject property <br /> the general rights described in Criteria 3 above. <br /> (5) The granting of the variance is not inconsistent with the goals and <br /> policies of the Everett general plan. <br /> (6) The need for the requested variance is not the result of a self- <br /> created hardship. <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.