My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1215 MADRONA AVE 2016-08-24
>
Address Records
>
MADRONA AVE
>
1215
>
1215 MADRONA AVE 2016-08-24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2017 8:54:01 PM
Creation date
8/24/2016 9:44:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
MADRONA AVE
Street Number
1215
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' <br />1 <br />' <br />' <br />1 <br />' <br />1 <br />' <br />' <br />, <br />' <br />1 <br />' <br />1 <br />' <br />' <br />' <br />1 <br />' <br />Gustafson Residence Retaining Wall NGA File No 924115 <br />1215 Madrona Avenue June 12, 2015 <br />Everett, Washington Page 10 <br />In the case of the helical anchors, the contractor should determine the tarque values required to achieve <br />the desired capacity. However, the anchors should advance a ininimum of 20 feet from the face of the <br />wall and one anchor be tested to confirm design capacities. <br />One anchor should be performance tested to 200 percent of the anchor design capacity. Tl�e performance <br />test should consist of cyclic loading in increments of 25 percent of the design load, as outlined in the <br />Federal Highways Administration (FHA) report No. FHWA/RD-82/047. The test location should be <br />determined in the feld, based on soil conditions observed during anchor installation. All other tiebacks <br />should be proof-tested to at least 130 percent of design capacity. <br />Wall Drainage and Slope Improvements <br />We recommend that after the pin piles are installed, a 4-incl� perforated PVC pipe be placed behind the <br />base of the wall and extended through the face of the retaining wall to aid in drainage through the wall. <br />The pipe should be surrounded by a minimuin of one foot of drain rock and the drain rock entirely <br />wrapped in a heavy-duty filter fabric prior to tl�e placement of the crushed rock backfill. The drain should <br />be tightlined into the existing drain systein or independently down to the base of the slope and adequately <br />anchored to the slope. If tiebacks are utilized, extreme care should be used, as to not disturb the tiebacks <br />during fill placement. We should be retained to evaluate the crushed rock placement during construction. <br />The areas along the top of the slope below the proposed wall should be improved by gently re-grading the <br />over-steepened/loosened areas, removing the vegetative cover, compacting the exposed surface to a non- <br />yielding condition, placing suitable erosion control systeins on tl�e prepared areas, and re-vegetating with <br />deep-rooted drought-resistant plants similarly to what has already been performed within the steep slope <br />area. The actual improvement methods for these areas will be highly depended on the conditions <br />encountered during construction. We should work with your contractor to determine the best course of <br />action at the time of construction. <br />We recommend that the exposed soi] be covered with heavy duty jute netting. The jute netting should be <br />staked at the top of the slope with 2- to 3-foot long metal rebar that has a metal "T" welded to the end. <br />The mat should be staked to the surface every five feet. After the matting is placed, we recommended that <br />deep-rooted vegetation be planted on the slope and grass seed be placed to re-establish vegetation growth. <br />The vegetation should be maintained until established. We recominend a mixture of 25% each of the <br />NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.