My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2510 W CASINO RD MAJESTIC GLOVE 2019-06-17
>
Address Records
>
W CASINO RD
>
2510
>
MAJESTIC GLOVE
>
2510 W CASINO RD MAJESTIC GLOVE 2019-06-17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/17/2019 1:12:30 PM
Creation date
9/20/2016 9:26:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
W CASINO RD
Street Number
2510
Tenant Name
MAJESTIC GLOVE
Notes
SHELL
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />� <br />issued. AIE impravements shall be complefed, approved, and warranted before the <br />Occupancy Permit is issued. <br />2. Parking mus� be per City Zoning Code and City Design and Construction Standards for <br />Developmenf. <br />3. Stormwafer shall be managed in basic accordance with the previousiy approved <br />Stormwater Sife Plan dated 2/� 2/2010. Or, in other words — it is vested under the drainage <br />standards and policies in existence af the fime of the ariginal land use application. <br />4. This project must comply with the current City of Everett Building Code and Sprinkler <br />Ordinance. <br />5. Special charges for connection fo fhe sewer and water systems in accordance with <br />Ordinance 1998-94 and subsequent revision are applicable. These charges are based on <br />projected water usage and can be substantial. Applicant is encouraged to obtain a copy of <br />the Ordinance and defermine estimated charges prior to building permit application. The <br />actual charges shall be computed by the Public Works Department per the ordinance in <br />effect af the time and according to the information on the approved plans at the time of <br />building permit issuance. <br />6. City streets are to be kept clear af dirt artd debris at a11 times during construction. Dust <br />suppressian and street cleaning musfi occur as directed I�y ihe Public Works Inspector. <br />'7. On-site watertnain will be staked wiihin an easement to the City. The easement wi[I be <br />submitted to the City prior to issuance of permits. <br />8, As-builts of storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water systems wili be required to be <br />submitted per Design and Construction Standards and Specifications far Development. <br />9. A traffic mitigation fee of $28,168 is due for Yhe proposed projecf. A traffic Mitigatian Fee of <br />$10,060 is due upon issuance of permits far the building shell/warehouse componenf. A <br />traffic Mitigation Fee of $18,108 is due upon issuance of permits for the mezzanine office <br />component. No site credit is due far this project because no land use for which mitigatian <br />is completed is displaced by #his project. The proposed revisian to this SEPA will have less <br />of a#raffic impact fhan the original praject proposed in 2049. <br />10. Proposed access onta W. Casino Road acceptabEe as shown. if any changes to access <br />paint onto W, Casino Road are proposed, access point shall be braught into compliance <br />with City o� Everett Standards. <br />11, Potential access onto Kasch Park Road is outside Traffic Engineering jurisdiction. If any <br />Ciiy departrr�ent with authority to allow this access requesfs a Traffic analysis of this option <br />we will provide if. This site r�peraies acceptab(y with access onto W Casino Road only and <br />does not require access onto Kasch Park Road for Traffic approval. <br />12. Traffic Engineering finds that 80 parkir�g spaces as proposed in ihe submifted Traffic <br />Impact Analysis is sufficieni to meet the parking demands for the specific business for <br />which the study was conducted (Majestic Glove}. This parking supply is sufficient io <br />accommodate the maximum demand far parking based on published ITE parking raies <br />and #he employee caunt descri[�ed in the praposal. The parking supply is not sufficient to <br />accommodafie #he parking demand at #he 85th percenfile based on the building square <br />footage, however. If this building changes uses and a more empfoyee-intensive type af <br />warehousing occupied this building there is the potential for a parking demand of more <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.