Ordinance 3387-14 - Laserfiche WebLink

More than 50 additional peak hour 1. Fee for fair share of planned system trips* improvements(e.g. identified in the City's six year transportation Fee for each peak hour trip per improvement program)— section 10.4 plus: plus: 2. Fair share of additional improvements, if any,to maintain acceptable levels of service as a result of the proposed project, as follows: If"D"or better at horizon year and no need for additional improvements 0 (taking growth into account)--> Project alone causes need for additional improvements at horizon year(no need if project did not occur, taking growth into account)—> 100%of cost of improvements Additional improvements needed to Project's%of total peak hour trips maintain"D"or better at horizon at horizon year,minus existing year,due to project and growth—> peak hour volume Additional improvements needed at Project's%of total peak hour trips horizon year due to project and at horizon year growth,but current level of service is "E"or"F"--> * for proposed projects in core area, trip calculation at 75% of ITE Trip Generation Manual or as justified in a traffic analysis Section 10: Fair share of system improvements 10.1 Two components of fair share. This section specifies the mitigation for transportation system improvements, unless otherwise agreed by the City Traffic Engineer. The fair share shall consist of two components: 1. A fee for each peak hour trip calculated to provide a fair share, attributed to new development, of the cost of "planned system improvements" (see Section 10.4 for fee amount);plus 2. Responsibility for a fair share of cost of additional improvements, if any, to maintain acceptable levels of service as a result of the proposed project (see Table 2 and Section 10.2 for method of calculating the fair share). When Level of Service "D" or better will be met at the horizon year with the project, the applicant shall not be required to pay a fair share contribution for additional transportation -8-