Laserfiche WebLink
Endangered" species protected under the Endangered Species Act. (These definitions and <br /> regulations are applicable in all areas of shoreline jurisdiction, except the Marshland <br /> Subarea.) <br /> • Planning Director's Interpretation 2-2000, (PDI 2-2000) Interim Procedures, Endangered <br /> Species Act Listing for Chinook Salmon and Bull Trout, or a subsequent procedure <br /> consistent with National Marine Fisheries Service(NMFS)4d rule. The PDI 2-2000 sets <br /> forth a procedure for reviewing projects that emulates the Section 7 consultation procedures <br /> practiced by NMFS. PDI 2-2000 requires a biological evaluation to be performed on all <br /> projects within shoreline jurisdiction and may require a more detailed biological assessment <br /> if circumstances warrant. Projects may be conditioned and or mitigation measures prescribed <br /> that exceed those in the City's critical areas ordinance(EMC 19.37). <br /> • Planning Director's Interpretation 01-005, (PDI 01-005). Standard Buffer Width <br /> Reduction. <br /> • EMC 19.37 Critical Areas and applicable definitions in EMC 19.04 in effect on April 28, <br /> 2006 (Applicable in Marshland Subarea only). <br /> • The Snohomish Estuary Wetland Integration Plan (SEWIP)including the SEWIP Salmon <br /> Overlay published in February 2001. The SEWIP work will serve as the primary inventory <br /> information and"Best Available Science" for those areas included in the SEWIP study area. <br /> • Marshland Subarea Plan. <br /> As stated above,these policies and regulations apply to all activities and uses in all <br /> environmental designations of the Shoreline Master Plan. Where conflict exists between any of <br /> these documents, the most protective of shoreline resources shall apply. This may mean that <br /> every parcel is not developable or fully developable as desired by a project proponent. Project <br /> proponents will be responsible for providing sufficient scientific information to document the <br /> environmental impacts and appropriate mitigation measures for their proposals. The City may <br /> deny projects that will result in significant ecological impacts that are not fully mitigated, even <br /> though the project is consistent with the use provisions of this SMP. <br /> The following goals, objectives,policies and regulations are in addition to those incorporated <br /> above. <br /> SECTION 6: Section 3.9 of the Shoreline Master Program, Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 2600- <br /> 02, as amended (Section II.I of Chapter 3 Shoreline Land Use Element of the Comprehensive <br /> Plan), is hereby amended by the addition of the following Objective: <br /> 9. Encourage restoration by limiting impacts on properties that are not being restored. <br /> SECTION 7: Policy 3 in Section 3.9 of the Shoreline Master Program, Exhibit A to Ordinance <br /> No. 2600-02, as amended (Section II.I of Chapter 3 Shoreline Land Use Element of the <br /> Comprehensive Plan), which currently reads as follows: <br /> 3. Highest priority should be given to the protection and restoration of fish and wildlife <br /> conservation areas as defined in EMC 19.37. These include <br /> • Habitats of primary association(A critical component(s)of the habitats of federally or <br /> state-listed endangered, threatened, candidate, sensitive, priority, and monitored <br /> 14 <br />