Laserfiche WebLink
Restoration and Land Use Concepts <br /> to their property <br /> • Overall, be a plan that members of the stakeholder advisory group can support, even <br /> if every member did not get 100%of what they were originally looking to achieve <br /> 3.2 Selection of the Subarea Plan Elements <br /> The primary issue in developing the final subarea plan (see Figure 1-1) revolved around the <br /> balance and locations of restoration, recreation and agricultural uses. The Everett Planning <br /> Commission discussed the merits of each alternative presented through the EIS in order to <br /> decide on a preferred alternative to be used in developing the final subarea plan. The <br /> Planning Commission noted that the restoration shown within Alternative 3 was preferred <br /> over that of Alternative 2 as the Maximum Restoration Alternative (Alternative 3) would <br /> support the largest number of salmon and would provide greater function to Wood Creek <br /> through the relocation of the Marshland Canal and pump station. The Planning Commission <br /> also noted that the greater number of recreation/public access elements in Alternative 2 was <br /> preferred over Alternative 3. Because of these issues, the final subarea plan was mainly a <br /> combination of Alternative 2 and 3. Specifically, the passive recreation area and trails along <br /> Larimer Road of Alternative 2 were included with the remaining restoration proposals of <br /> Alternative 3. The final subarea plan also excluded any action from private property owners <br /> not interested in participating. Finally, the subarea plan would provide an allowance for <br /> residential development along Larimer Road where property owners can meet applicable <br /> development requirements. <br /> 3.3 Subarea Plan Features <br /> The Marshland Subarea Plan provides for a balance in restoration, recreation, agriculture, <br /> and residential land uses within the Marshland Subarea. The specific features of the plan <br /> include: <br /> • Relocating the existing flood control pump station and allowing fish passage around <br /> or through it if feasible and if impacts can be prevented or mitigated. <br /> • Reorienting the Marshland Canal so that it flows into the Snohomish River at the <br /> southeastern corner of the subarea if feasible and if impacts can be prevented or <br /> mitigated. <br /> • Establishing tidally restored areas on City- and privately owned properties in the <br /> central western and northeastern portions of the study area to provide a tidal <br /> connection between the City's undeveloped park property and private lands on both <br /> Draft Subarea Plan June 2009 <br /> Everett Marshland 32 070346-01 <br />