Laserfiche WebLink
Table 1. Comparison of Functional Values, Exisring Wetlands m be Removed vs. Proposed <br /> Mitigation Area <br /> Areas to be Impacred Mitigadon Area <br /> Functio¢ Wetland B Wetland C Shaltow Emergent <br /> Hydrologic Support Minimai L.ow Moderate <br /> Streambase Flow Contribution Minimal Low Moderate <br /> Shoreline Stabilization N.A. N.A. N.A. � <br /> Water Quality Improvement Minimal Low Moderate <br /> S�ocm/Floodwater Management Minimal Low Moderate <br /> Groundwater Rechazge Minimal Low Low <br /> Wildlife IIabitatBiological Funcdons Minimal Low Moderate <br /> Overall Value Low Low Moderate <br /> Impact Area Size (acres) 0.016 0.079 0.289 <br /> Performance standards have been established ro ensure project success and provide a set of criteria <br /> for evaluating contractor and design effectiveness in meeting project goals. <br /> The monitoring Program will use performance standazds to assess project success over a five yeaz <br /> period following miugation construction and provide data to judge degree ro which individual <br /> componenu of the overall mifigadon plan meet the desired requirements. Coupled with the <br /> mouitoring program, potential contingency actions may be considered by the moaitoring biologist <br /> and Ciry oF Everett staff at key review points, for implementation in the event of identified mitigation <br /> shortfall. Based on an ini6al review of project cosu and approval by the Ciry, a performa�ece <br /> securiry bond will be recorded by the applicant, to ensure that all costs for monitoring and <br /> maintenance will be met during a five yeaz monitoring period and that conungency acfloas can be <br /> accomplished following completion of wetlands construction. <br /> 3.2 Goals and Objectives <br /> The principal project goal is creation of approximately 12,600 squaze feet of scrub-shrub and <br /> emergent wetlaad in two areas adjacent to a functional weUand (Wedand E) in the southwest wrner <br /> of the site. <br /> Other goals to be accomplished by the proposed mitigaaon plan include: <br /> • conversion of low-value and disturbed uplands to new wetlands adjacent to an established, <br /> funcfional wetland system, <br /> Mukilteo Sch. Dist. Certtral Facility Final Miagoaon Plan PagC 9 <br /> Lovell-Sauerland &Associates, lnc. <br />