Laserfiche WebLink
• � � <br /> The City provided written notice to all property owners within <br /> 300 feet of the subject property and no comments were <br /> received regazding the prc,posed variance. <br /> Conclusioos: The proposed variance is not anticipated to be <br /> materially detrimental to the neighborhood area or the City as <br /> a whote. <br /> Criterion No. 3: <br /> That the variance will only grant the subject property the same general <br /> rights enjoyed by other property in the same uea and zone as the subject <br /> property. <br /> a. Findings: The applicant states that the proposed rockery <br /> would be similaz the those existing on the subject property. <br /> The rockery has been engineered and the soil has been <br /> evaluated as suitable for the rockery wall. Since a six foot <br /> hiah rockery exists on the property, this would serve to grant <br /> the same general rights enjoyed by others. <br /> b. Conclusions: There were no similaz rockeries in the <br /> immediate neighborhood azea identified by the applicant. <br /> However,the granting of the variance would allow the <br /> applicant and neighbors the full use of their yazd azeas as <br /> enjoyed by other properties in the surrounding azea. <br /> � <br /> Criterioo No. 4. <br /> That the variance is the minimum necessary to allow the subject property <br /> the general rights described in Criterion 3. <br /> a. Findings: See Criteria#3. <br /> b. Conclusions: See Criteria#3 <br /> Criterion No. 5: <br /> The granting of the variance is consistent with the goals and policies of the <br /> Everett General Plan. <br /> 3 <br /> 35. <br />