Laserfiche WebLink
,������ . �,. „ , �. <br />August 28, 2013 <br />Meg Haley <br />City of Everett <br />Public Works <br />3200 Cedar Street <br />PO Box 3�4019 <br />Everett, VVA 98201 <br />Plan Review: B1307-015 <br />Project: E=astlake Community Church <br />Address: 9506 7`F' Ave SE Everett, WA 98208 <br />Dear Ms. Haley, <br />Here are our responses to your permit review comments of August 20, 2013. Your <br />comments are in italics and our responses follow in bold. <br />General <br />1, T."he drawings should include the information requested in thepre�ious <br />,. i_r,�comnlete submittal letter under the 'Occupancy'section. <br />a. A0.1 indicates that sprinklers and alarm re�isions are deferred submittals, <br />but sheet A1.2 indicates that sprinklers and alarm systems are not <br />prouided. <br />SABA Response: A0.1 has been has been modified there will be no future <br />submittals for Sprinklers or Fire alarms, as stated on A1.2 <br />sprinklers and fire alarm are not provided. <br />� Z. The response letter should indicate if a new certificate of occupancy is <br />requested. <br />SABA Response: A new certificate of occupancy is not being requested. <br />Occupancy <br />1. The maximum occupant loads shown are larger than the originally permitted <br />�' building occupant load of 858. <br />a. Increased occupant loads shown on A1.2 would trigger the requirement <br />for sprinklers and a detection system, per IBC sections 903.2.1.3 and <br />907.2.1.1. <br />SABA Response: Occupancy calculations have been provided on sheet <br />A1.2 the occupant load is less than 858. The occupants are <br />shown in the rooms the occupants shown in the corridors were <br />aggregate of the building occupants shown as they exit the <br />building not additional occupants. We normally show the <br />_ ; ; <br />