Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation <br />Pepe Retaining Wall <br />Everett, Washii�gton <br />C� <br />NGA File No. 916915 <br />April 27, 2015 <br />Page 12 <br />tieback installation to ve�•ify that tiebacks do not encounter any existing structures or underground <br />uti I ities. <br />No-Load Zone: The anchor portion of all tiebacks must be located a sufficient distance behind the wall <br />face to develop resistance within a stable soil m�ss. We recommend the anchorage be obtained behind an <br />assumed no-load zone. The no-load zone is defined by a line extending horizontally from the base of the <br />wall back towards the residcnce a distance of tive feet. The line sho�ild then extenci up from the base <br />elevation at an angle from the horizontal of 60 degrees. We expect that some undocumented fill may <br />Ehist beyond 2he no-load zone. We therefore recom��end that the unbonded portion of the anchors extend <br />through any �Il soils that u�ay exist outside the no-load zone. We recommend that we monitor soil <br />conditions d�rring anchor installation in order to evaluate adequate penetration into competent soils. <br />Soil Design Values: Load carrying capacities should be determined based on 1,000 psf grout to soil <br />adhesion in the bonded portion of the anchors. We recommend that we review anchor design and <br />proposed installation methods. We should also observe anchor installation and testing. The anchors <br />should be permanent double-corrosive protected anchors. <br />Tieback Anchor Installation and Testing: The contractor should be responsible for using equipment <br />suited for the site conditions due to litnited site infortnation, a test anchor may be considered to verify site <br />conditions prior to finalizing plans. <br />One anchor should be performance tested to 200 percent of the anchor design capacity. The performance <br />test should consist of cyclic loading in increments of 25 percent of the design load, as outlined in the <br />Federal Highways Administration (FHA) report Na FHWA/RD-82/047. The test location sllould be <br />determined in the field, based on soil conditions observed during anchor installation. All other tiebacks <br />sllould be proof-tested to at least 130 percent of design capacity. <br />Drainage Improvements <br />The finished ground surfac�e should be graded s�ich that runofi� is directed to an appropriate stormwater <br />collection system. Water should not be allowed to collect in any areas behind the wall or on pavement <br />areas. Final site grades should allow for draina�e away from the residence and wall. We suggest that the <br />finished ground be sloped at a minim�nn gradient ol�three percent, fior a distance of at least 10 Feet away <br />NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />