Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation <br />Pepe Retaining Wall <br />Everett, WashingYon <br />NGA File No. 916915 <br />April 27, 2015 <br />Page l I <br />We recommend that the wall be analyzed using a triangular earth pressure distribution equivalent to that <br />exerted by a fltiid with a density of 50 pounds per cubic foot (pc� for yielding (active) condition, and 70 <br />pcf for non-yielding (at-rest) condition. <br />These recommended lateral earth pressures are (or a drained granular backfill and are based on the <br />assumption of a horizontal �,ro�md s�u�face behind the wall for � distance of at least the subsurface height <br />ofi the wall, and do not acco�mt for� surcharge loads. Additional lateral earth pressures should be <br />considered for surcharge loads actin�; adjacei�t to the wall and within a distance equal to the subs�irface <br />height of the wall. This would include the effects of surcharges such as traffiic loads, floor slab loads, <br />slopcs, or other surface loads. We could consult with the structural engineer regarding additional loads on <br />retaining walls d�iring final design, if necded. <br />All wall backfill should be well compacted free-draining material as outlined in the Structural Fill <br />subsection of this report. Care should be taken to prevent the buildup of excess (ateral soil pressures due <br />to over-compaction of the wall backfill. This can be accomplished by placing wall backfill in 8-inch <br />loose lifts and compacting the backfill with small, hand-operated compactors within a distance behind the <br />wall equal to at least one-half tl�e height of the wall. The thickness of the loose lifts shouid be reduced to <br />accommodate the lower compactive enerby of the hand-operated equipment. "I'he recominended level of <br />compaction should still be maintained. <br />The recommended lateral loads should be applied across the pile spacing above the excavation line. The <br />lateral pressures co�ild be partially resisted by passive resistance acting on the below-grade portion of the <br />piles. We recommend using 100 pcf p�ssive resistance action on two-pile diair�eter. The upper (ive feet <br />of soil should be neglected. The measurements and conditions of the grouted portions of the wall beams <br />should be evaluated by the structural engineer prior to calculating the passive resistance on the piles, <br />otherwise, all lateral forces should be picked up by the tiebacks. A unifonr� surcharge of 8H should be <br />applied to the wall design to account for seismic loading, where H is the exposed height of the wall. We <br />should be retained to review final plans, monitor installation of the wall repairs, and evaluate tiebacks. <br />Tiebacks <br />General: Grouted tieback anchors are needed for the design for the repair or replacement of the wall. We <br />recommend that one of the anchors be tested to a mini����im of 200 percent of the design loads to confiirm <br />design values. We recoinmenci that meas�n-ements be made by the contractor in the field at the time of <br />NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOC/ATES, INC. <br />