My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003/07/02 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2003
>
2003/07/02 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2017 10:05:34 AM
Creation date
1/11/2017 10:04:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
7/2/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
253
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
How Sound Transit's Lawful Use of Debt to Finance Phase I Devolved into Illegality <br /> Joint Regional Policy Committee Plan(May, 1993) Debt usage was left largely inchoate <br /> $4.9 Billion "Study Option" (September, 1994) Zero debt ("pay as you go" funding) <br /> $4.9 Billion "Study Option" formally endorsed by "Pay as you go" funding encouraged <br /> Eastside Transportation Partnership (October, 1994) by local governments (through ETP) <br /> Higher "RTA Phase I System Proposal" by County Debt use was to be hoisted from zero <br /> Executives Gary Locke, Doug Sutherland and Bob (qua "pay as you go")to $1.3 billion, <br /> Drewel for "extended light rail" (October 7, 1994) $1.5 billion or $1.7 billion (in bonds) <br /> King County Council Chairman Kent Pullen resists Long-term debt limit at $800 million, <br /> Executives' 11`h-hour efforts to hike debt from zero or less, negotiated and agreed for all <br /> to $1.3-to-$1.7 billion (mid-to-late October, 1994) Phase I plans submitted to taxpayers <br /> "Master Plan" and first Phase I plan thereunder are Limits on long-term debt set at $800 <br /> adopted for submission at polls (October 29, 1994) million or 16 percent of capital costs <br /> Each county council legislatively authorizes Phase Long-term-debt limit becomes a term <br /> I ballots, with limits on local-option taxes and debt, of Sound Transit's separate statutory <br /> as statutory conditions precedent (December, 1994) contract with each of three counties <br /> Debt level is formally found "reasonable" by state- Long-term-debt limit integrated into <br /> appointed Expert Review Panel (February, 1995) ERP's statutorily-required approvals <br /> Limits on local-option taxes and on debt formally Long-term-debt limit, "legislatively <br /> reaffirmed for second Phase I plan (April 18, 1995) authorized"by counties, reaffirmed <br /> Revised Phase I Draft Plan (approved March, 1996) $993 million (long-and-short term) <br /> Revised Phase I Plan(adopted May 31, 1996) $1.052 billion (long-and-short term) <br /> Final EIS for Revised Phase I (November, 1999) $1.1 billion (as adjusted for inflation) <br /> Bob White's Desperation Proposal (January, 2001) $1.904 billion(long-and-short term) <br /> Central Link Board Workbook(May/June, 2001) Higher debt implicated but not stated <br /> Brian McCartan's Fiscal Briefing (February, 2003) $1.5+billion (long-and-short term) <br /> Joni Earl's Presentation to ETP (March, 2003) $1.8+billion (long-and-short term) <br /> James Mac Isaac's Analysis of Truncated Phase I $2.5+billion (long-and-short term) <br /> Will Knedlik's Debt Calculation for Entire Phase I $4.4+billion (long-and-short term) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.