Laserfiche WebLink
' Washington Preservation Initiative 4 <br /> 2003 Grant Application <br /> CONDITION <br /> The Juleen panorama negatives are in fragile and vulnerable condition. <br /> While the image quality is good, the negatives are in various stages of <br /> deterioration. Many are brittle and need special handling. These panoramas have <br /> posed problems since acquisition, since they came to us rolled and stored in their <br /> original film boxes. When we first received them, prints were made, in segments, <br /> of the 1912 Everett city views. These have been popular with the public, both for <br /> displays as well as for enlargements of specific buildings or homes. Requests are <br /> frequent. We presently cannot fill these requests. Many of the panorama views <br /> have not been seen in the last decade, and there are a number of these images <br /> that the public has not seen since the library obtained them in 1978. Due to their <br /> current condition, we no longer allow prints to be made from the originals. Having <br /> these images duplicated would make them once again accessible. Without <br /> duplication, they will soon be lost. The priority is image preservation. Once that is <br /> taken care of, access is possible, thanks to our digital capabilities. <br /> 3. What efforts have already been made to resolve the problem or need, <br /> or to take advantage of the opportunity? <br /> Consider the following items in developing the response: <br /> • Changes to library operations and library systems <br /> • Expenditures related to staffing, technology, library operations, collections, <br /> or other cost categories <br /> I • The use of local funding <br /> • The use of other funding <br /> Review and Evaluation <br /> This question worth 5 points. Reviewers will look for: <br /> • Concerted efforts to take full advantage of local resources first <br /> ■ A continued need for further assistance <br /> When the library received the Juleen negatives, John Witter, an instructor at <br /> Everett Community College who taught courses in photographic history and <br /> preservation, volunteered as an advisor. Mr. Witter's credentials were excellent. <br /> He was one of the Rochester Institute of Technology's early researchers and <br /> writers regarding photo preservation and copying. <br /> Mr. Witter categorized the negatives into groups and helped us prioritize for their <br /> preservation. He recommended storage materials for the originals, and suggested <br /> that we make standard archival prints and safety film duplicate negatives, either in <br /> 4 x 5 or same-size format. We followed his advice, and to date, the glass <br /> negatives as well as most of the 5 x 7 and 8 x 10 sheet nitrate negatives have <br /> been printed. Some have copy negatives. All have been identified. An initial <br /> database was made using Microsoft Access. <br /> Page 11 of 21 18 <br />