Laserfiche WebLink
transmit the project power to market.2 Under this test, the line leading from the project <br /> ceases to be a primary line at the point it is no longer used solely to transmit power from <br /> the project to the interconnected grid.3 <br /> The South Line does not constitute a primary line as that term is used in 16 U.S.C. <br /> § 796(11),because the South Line is no longer used solely to transmit power from the <br /> Jackson Project but is part of the PUD's loop transmission system. It is used to transmit <br /> power from BPA and other sources in addition to the Jackson Project, which allows the <br /> PUD to service the Sultan, Woods Creek, West Monroe, and Goldbar substations and <br /> provide backup capability to other PUD substations served by the Jackson Loop. <br /> Another use of the South Line is to prevent disruption of service in the event of an <br /> outage on the Jackson Loop. If such an outage were to occur, only one circuit (either the <br /> North Line or the South Line) would trip, allowing part of the transmission load to <br /> remain operational. This circuit configuration allows the load connected to the faulted <br /> circuit to be isolated and transferred to the other circuit. Additionally, the South Line is <br /> also used to reduce outage exposure in the event of a BPA Snohomish bus outage. To <br /> 2 See, e.g., Pacific Gas and Electric Co., 85 FERC 1161,411 at p. 62,559 (1998) (finding <br /> PG&E's transmission lines carry flows from other electric generating sources when their <br /> licensed generating units are down, and as such are not primary lines requiring licensing). <br /> 3 See New York Power Authority, 98 FERC¶61,033 (2002) (finding that the <br /> transmission line was an integral part of the interconnected transmission facilities under <br /> control of the New York Independent System Operator ISO and was used to transmit <br /> power from both project and non-project sources, therefore the line was no longer a <br /> primary line of the Project); Montana Power Co. and PP&L Montana, LLC, 89 FERC11 <br /> 62,182 (1999) (stating that the transmission lines should be deleted from the license <br /> because they were no longer used solely to transmit power from the project,but instead <br /> carried power from both project and non-project sources);New England Power Co. and <br /> USGen, Inc., 85 FERC¶ 62,113 (1998) (finding that the transmission facilities serve <br /> local areas or interconnected the regional transmission system and are no longer the <br /> primary lines for the project, but rather are part of the regional transmission system). <br /> 5 <br />