510 ALVERSON BLVD 2018-01-02 MF Import

I July 7, 1960 Page Four 4. The height of the fence is actually ten (10) feet as � the six (6) foot fence is setting on a four (4) foot concrete retaining wall. � 5. As the fence exists now, there is not room enough for � ' a wheelbarrow to pass along the sidewalk. !� 6. They sugqest a screening effect rather than the ten (10) foot fence. Percy Muchler of 426 Alverson Blvd stated the view is important to the residente and the new fence deters from the view. , Mr. Willoughby' s rebuttal statements were as follows: � 1. He feels the fence height is 5' 6". 2. �Whether the fence is 42" or 72" it probably would not � make any difference in reference to the movement of a wheelbarrow bn the sidewalk. 3. One-half of the retaining wall belongs to each property owner. 4. The aix (6) foot fence from the rear of the house to the , binff is a legal fence. There wae no further comment from the audience. After visually viewing the subject property and considering all the facts and teatimony, the Board members felt they do' not have the jur.isdiction to rule on this var.tance request and it ahould be taken to the legal ataff of the �ity of Everett to make the deciaion. � Chairmbn 2ook explained two of the Board's main concerns are where is the legal boundary line and should the height of the fence be measured from the top of the retaining wall or from the ground level. Mr. Rusaell returned ,to act as Chairman. A hearing was held on the application of Roeblin D1ana ement Co. , 1512 South Broadway (Everett Mall) , Everett, Wash ngton 98204 , for a variance from Section 19.04. 010 of the Everett Municipal Code, Definitions, Paragraph 24 , for permission to construct a convenience center on a lot that fronts on a P.U.D. right-of- way rather than a atreet or alley.