1002 ANGLE LN 2016-01-01 MF Import

;� ... J i.� 1� . �• 1 61AY 0 9 13:;0 BO11RD OF AD.TUSTl�NT ............................................. . ..... FINDINGS, CONCLU3IOIIS ANU ORDSR CITY Of[V[ftETT V1IRIANCE NO. 9-90 Public Works Dept. Babed upon the written request for a variance from the City's zoninq code by: Everett Peninsula Investment Ronald K. wheeler P.O. Box 564 Mukilteo, WA 98275 hereinafter referred to as "Applicant." For a vnriance from Section 8, Front Yards, to allow construc- tion of a sinqle family structure on ench of the following three parcels with a front setback less then the twanty feet required by code. This same variance was granted by the Board of l�djustment on June 8, 1988s however, buildinq permits were not obtained within one year of that date and so the variance expired. On the property commonly known as: Parcels 1 and 3 of BI.�► IB708115004 and Lots 37,78,39 end 40 of Hewitt Heights Addi- tion, all on the south side of Angle Lane. The eoerd o! Adjustment, followinq a public hearing on seid epplication held on Mny 7, 1990, and further havinq reviewad all testimony, mekes the followinq Findings, Conclusions and order: Critarion No. 1• Thet the veriance is necessary because of exceptional or ex- traordinary circumstances reqardinq the size, shepe, topography, or location of the subject property; or the loca- tion of a pre-existinq improvement on the subject property thnt conformed to the zoninq code in effect when the improvement was constructed. s, g�;, The subject property consists of three seperete percels with extreme topographic changea. Each of the three lots hae a level area thnt varies from zero to twen- ty-nine feet south of the edqe of Angle Lane riqht of way. The remninder of the lots drop off rapidly to the bottom of a steep ravine. The Applicant is proposing to utilize the level aree on the front of each lot to provide bearinga for footinqs, qarage slabs, driveways, and provide for off-street perk- inq Por two cars. Hecauae of the extreme slope of the lots, it will be necessary to construct the homes on pil- ing foundations. l�,nqle Lane has a0 feet of right of way and the 30 foot street improvement utilizes only the northern portion of the right of ay, so there is 10 feet of unimproved rlght of way abutting the subject lots that will provide a set- back from the street if the variances are granted. b. Concl�sion: There are unusual circumstances applyinq to the subject lot because of the topography and the fact that there is unused right of way on Anqle Lane.