Laserfiche WebLink
Criterion No. 2• ' <br /> That the variance will not be materially detrimental to the <br /> property in the area of the subject property or to the City as <br /> a whole. <br /> a. giII�II�� Moving the house forrrard on the lot would not <br /> block anyone's view and would not create a traffic hazard. <br /> Because of the unused riqht of way there would still be <br /> room to park a car in front of the qaraqe without intrud- <br /> inq into the street. Public Works had no adverse comments <br /> on qrantinq this variance. <br /> The applicant will be providinq four off-street parkinq <br /> spacea (two in the qaraqe and two in front of the garage) . <br /> b. Conclueion: Grantinq this variance would not be ma- <br /> terially detrimental to the property in the aren or to the <br /> City as a whole. <br /> Critarion Mo. 3• <br /> That the variance will only grent the subject property the seme <br /> qeneral righta enjoyed by other pr��perty in the same aree end <br /> zone as the subject property. <br /> a. F,�� There are other housses in the north end that do <br /> not meat the twanty foot front aetback. In addition, a <br /> variance was qranted !or lront yard aetback and a housa <br /> constructed on Parcel 2 bacauae of the steep slope. <br /> b. �{�i Granting this varience will ellow the owner n <br /> proparty right enjoyed by others in the same area and <br /> zona. <br /> Crit�rion No. 4• <br /> Thet the variance is the minimum necessary to allow the subject <br /> property the qeneral riqhts described in Criterion 7. <br /> a. p�aq,;, The level area available Por anchorinq the loun- <br /> dation is very limited end any less o! a vnriance would <br /> creete a qreater hardship for construction oi a home. <br /> b. �y�p� Grantinq this variance is the minimum neces- <br /> sr.ry to allow the property rights enjoyed by others in the <br /> seme area and zone. <br /> Criterion No. 5• <br /> The grantinq of the variance is not inconsistent with the qoals <br /> and policiea of the Everett General Plan. <br /> e. Findina:The General Plan designatea the area for sinqle <br /> family residential. <br /> b. �onclusion: The proposed use is single family and so will <br /> not be inconsiatent with the General Plan. <br /> Critezion No. 6• <br /> The need for the reqv.ested variance is not the reault of a <br /> self-created hardshi��. <br /> a. Findina: The topoqraphy of the lot is the reason for re- <br /> questinq the variance. <br /> b. Concluaion: The need for the variance is not the result <br /> of a selP-created hardship. <br /> I <br /> 2 <br /> I i <br />