Laserfiche WebLink
Criterion No. 2• ' <br /> That the variance will not be materially detrimental to the <br /> property in the area of the subject property or to the City as <br /> a whole. <br /> n. Findina: Movinq the house forward on the lot would not <br /> block anyone's view and would not create a traPfic hazard. <br /> Because of the unused riqht of way there would still be <br /> room to park a car in front of the garage without intrud- <br /> inq into the street. Public Works had no adverse comments <br /> on granting this variance. <br /> The applicant will be providing four ofi-street perklnq <br /> spaces (two in the qarage and two in front of the qaraqe) . <br /> b. Concluaion: Grantinq this varience would not be ma- � <br /> terially detrimental to the property in the erea or to the <br /> City es a whole. ' <br /> Critarion No. 3: ' <br /> I <br /> Thet the variance will only grent the subject property the seme ' <br /> generel rights enjoyed by other property in the snme area and , <br /> , zona ns the subject property. <br /> s. lindina: Thare are other houses in the north end thet do <br /> not meet the twenty foot lront setback. In eddition, e I <br /> � variancs was granted !or lront yerd setback end a house � <br /> constructed on Parcel 2 becauee oP the staep slope. <br /> b. S�C1yl1QpL Granting this varience will allow the owner e <br /> proparty riqht enjoyed by others in the same erea and <br /> i aone. ' <br /> �� git�rion Mo. �• i <br /> „ <br /> � Thet th� variance is the minlmum necessary to ellow the subject <br /> �; prop�rty the qaneral riqhts describad in Critarion 3. <br /> � e. � The level area evailable !or anchorinq tha Loun- <br /> � dation is vary limited and any lass oP a varianca would <br /> cresta a greater hardship !or construction of e hosa. <br /> � b. �� Gxanting this variance is the minimum n�cas- � <br /> sery to ellow tha property rights enjoyed by others in tha <br /> sa�e eree and zona. ' <br /> Critarion No. 5s ' <br /> The qranting of the variance is not inconsistent with tha qoals <br /> and policies of the Everett General Plan. I <br /> e. Findina:The General Plen designates the aren for sinqle ! <br /> femily residential. <br /> � b. �pppjy/ipII;. The proposed uea is single family end sa will <br /> � not be inconsistent with the General Plan. <br /> � f.'riterion No. 6• <br /> ' The need !or the requeated variance is not the result o! a ; <br /> isel!-created hardship. <br /> � e. F1ndlna: The topoqraphy of the lot is the reason for re- <br /> questinq the variance. <br /> , b. Conclusion: The need for the variance is not the result <br /> i of n self-created hardship. <br /> I <br /> i 2 i <br /> 1 I <br /> I <br /> II <br /> !� ( <br />