1020 ANGLE LN 2016-01-01 MF Import

/U ?o -• Ai�l� Cn, . _ ;, .. ; r��aY o's ��s�� ___ _... ...... ... .. .................. CITY C�� :':��,=TT PuLlic 4'lcrics Dcpt. BOARD OF AWUSTlIBN'P FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS A!(D ORDER VARIANCS NO. 4-90 Based upon the written request for a variance from the City's zoning code by: Bert Larsson 5807 Hiqhway Place EVerett, WA 98203 hereinafter referred to as "Applicant," for a variance from Section 8 of the Zoninq Code, which requires a 20 foot front yard setback, to allow construction of a single family struc- � ture that would have a six foot front yard setback insteed of the twenty foot front yard setbnck requlred by code. on the property described as: Lot 25 throuqh 30, Block 29, Hewitt Heiqhts Addition The Board of Adjustment, following a public hearing on said application held on May 7, 1990, and further havinq reviewed all teatimony, makes the following Findings, Conclusiona and Order: g�NDING3 ]l� CONCLUSI�N3: t�ri*e -�on No. ?• That the variance is necessary because of exceptional or ex- traordinary circumstances regarding the stze, shape, topoqra- phy, or location of the subject property; or the location of a pre-existing improvement on the subject property that conlormed to the zoning code in effect when the improvement was con- structed. e, Pi��+{�� The subject property consiets of an approximate- ly 11,500 square foot lot with extreme topogrephic changes. There is an approximately 50 foot by 50 foot buildable aren located in the southeast corner of the lot with the remeinder of the lot fallinq off rapidly to form a steep ravine. The applicant is propoeing to have a six i foot front setback instead of the twenty feet required by � code. The etreet in front of the property dead ends ap- �roximately 35 feet west of the eaat corner of the eubject property. The street has 60 feet of right of way with ap- proximately twenty feet of pavinq which leavas fourteen feet of unused right of way. If the variance is granted, there would be twenty feet from the front of the proposed structure to the edge of the paving. b, r.+n�� +ai�.+: There are unusual circumstances applying to the subject lot because of the topoqraphy and the fact that there is unused right of way on 39th Street. criterion No. z: That the variance will not be materially detrimental to the property in the area of the subject property or to the City as a whole. g, Finri�na� Moving the house forward on the lot would not block anyone's view and would not create a traffic hazard. Because of the unused right of way there would still be